GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-P8GW-HVF3-XMC4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-02-14 15:32 – Updated: 2026-03-25 12:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rxrpc: Fix data-race warning and potential load/store tearing

Fix the following:

    BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker / rxrpc_send_data_packet

which is reporting an issue with the reads and writes to ->last_tx_at in:

    conn->peer->last_tx_at = ktime_get_seconds();

and:

    keepalive_at = peer->last_tx_at + RXRPC_KEEPALIVE_TIME;

The lockless accesses to these to values aren't actually a problem as the read only needs an approximate time of last transmission for the purposes of deciding whether or not the transmission of a keepalive packet is warranted yet.

Also, as ->last_tx_at is a 64-bit value, tearing can occur on a 32-bit arch.

Fix both of these by switching to an unsigned int for ->last_tx_at and only storing the LSW of the time64_t. It can then be reconstructed at need provided no more than 68 years has elapsed since the last transmission.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-23118"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-362"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-02-14T15:16:06Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc: Fix data-race warning and potential load/store tearing\n\nFix the following:\n\n        BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker / rxrpc_send_data_packet\n\nwhich is reporting an issue with the reads and writes to -\u003elast_tx_at in:\n\n        conn-\u003epeer-\u003elast_tx_at = ktime_get_seconds();\n\nand:\n\n        keepalive_at = peer-\u003elast_tx_at + RXRPC_KEEPALIVE_TIME;\n\nThe lockless accesses to these to values aren\u0027t actually a problem as the\nread only needs an approximate time of last transmission for the purposes\nof deciding whether or not the transmission of a keepalive packet is\nwarranted yet.\n\nAlso, as -\u003elast_tx_at is a 64-bit value, tearing can occur on a 32-bit\narch.\n\nFix both of these by switching to an unsigned int for -\u003elast_tx_at and only\nstoring the LSW of the time64_t.  It can then be reconstructed at need\nprovided no more than 68 years has elapsed since the last transmission.",
  "id": "GHSA-p8gw-hvf3-xmc4",
  "modified": "2026-03-25T12:30:19Z",
  "published": "2026-02-14T15:32:18Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-23118"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d5fe8bcd331f1e34e0943ec7c18432edfcf0e8b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a426f29ac3fa3465093567ab763ada46762fb57c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c08cf314191cd0f8699089715efb9eff030f0086"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f8cf1368e0a5491b27189a695c36f64e48f3d19d"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…