GHSA-P6HC-C268-H4WX
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 00:26 – Updated: 2022-05-17 00:26
VLAI
Details
In Asterisk 11.x before 11.25.3, 13.x before 13.17.2, and 14.x before 14.6.2 and Certified Asterisk 11.x before 11.6-cert18 and 13.x before 13.13-cert6, insufficient RTCP packet validation could allow reading stale buffer contents and when combined with the "nat" and "symmetric_rtp" options allow redirecting where Asterisk sends the next RTCP report.
Severity
7.5 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2017-14603"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-200"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2017-10-10T01:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In Asterisk 11.x before 11.25.3, 13.x before 13.17.2, and 14.x before 14.6.2 and Certified Asterisk 11.x before 11.6-cert18 and 13.x before 13.13-cert6, insufficient RTCP packet validation could allow reading stale buffer contents and when combined with the \"nat\" and \"symmetric_rtp\" options allow redirecting where Asterisk sends the next RTCP report.",
"id": "GHSA-p6hc-c268-h4wx",
"modified": "2022-05-17T00:26:11Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T00:26:11Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-14603"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-27274"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/security/AST-2017-008.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3990"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…