GHSA-P3VC-36G9-X9GR
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-15 16:52 – Updated: 2026-07-15 22:05A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the @angular/common package of Angular. The formatNumber function, which is also utilized by DecimalPipe, PercentPipe, and CurrencyPipe, does not properly validate the upper bounds of the digitsInfo parameter. Specifically, the minimum and maximum fraction digits parsed from the digitsInfo string (e.g., 1.2-4) are converted to integers and used without limits.
When parsing a maliciously crafted digitsInfo string with excessively large fraction digit values (e.g., 1.200000000-200000000), the internal roundNumber function attempts to pad the digits array to match the requested fraction size. This results in an unbounded loop that repeatedly pushes elements into an array.
Impact
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows an attacker to trigger resource exhaustion, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS):
- Server-Side Rendering (SSR): In applications using SSR (e.g.,
@angular/ssr), an attacker can crash the Node.js server process due to aJavaScript heap out of memoryerror. This affects the availability of the application for all users. - Client-Side Rendering (CSR): In standard client-side applications, the unbounded loop will block the main thread, freezing the user's browser tab and making it unresponsive.
Attack Preconditions
For this vulnerability to be exploitable, the following conditions must be met:
- Vulnerable Component Usage: The application must use Angular's number formatting utilities, such as the
formatNumberfunction directly, or via template pipes (DecimalPipe,PercentPipe,CurrencyPipe). - Attacker-Controlled Parameter: The
digitsInfoparameter passed to these utilities must be customizable or directly controlled by untrusted user input (e.g., parsed from query parameters, user preference settings, or API responses that accept user-defined formatting options). IfdigitsInfois trusted or limited to a known, defined range for its value, the vulnerability is not exploitable by external attackers.
Patches
- 22.0.0-rc.2
- 21.2.15
- 20.3.22
- 19.2.23
Credits
This vulnerability was discovered and reported by CodeMender from Google DeepMind.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@angular/common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "22.0.0-next.0"
},
{
"fixed": "22.0.0-rc.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@angular/common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "20.0.0-next.0"
},
{
"fixed": "20.3.22"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@angular/common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "19.0.0-next.0"
},
{
"fixed": "19.2.23"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@angular/common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"last_affected": "18.2.14"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@angular/common"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "21.0.0-next.0"
},
{
"fixed": "21.2.15"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-50171"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400",
"CWE-834"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-15T16:52:30Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-22T18:16:42Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the `@angular/common` package of Angular. The `formatNumber` function, which is also utilized by `DecimalPipe`, `PercentPipe`, and `CurrencyPipe`, does not properly validate the upper bounds of the `digitsInfo` parameter. Specifically, the minimum and maximum fraction digits parsed from the `digitsInfo` string (e.g., `1.2-4`) are converted to integers and used without limits.\n\nWhen parsing a maliciously crafted `digitsInfo` string with excessively large fraction digit values (e.g., `1.200000000-200000000`), the internal `roundNumber` function attempts to pad the digits array to match the requested fraction size. This results in an unbounded loop that repeatedly pushes elements into an array.\n\n### Impact\n\nSuccessful exploitation of this vulnerability allows an attacker to trigger resource exhaustion, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS):\n\n* **Server-Side Rendering (SSR):** In applications using SSR (e.g., `@angular/ssr`), an attacker can crash the Node.js server process due to a `JavaScript heap out of memory` error. This affects the availability of the application for all users. \n* **Client-Side Rendering (CSR):** In standard client-side applications, the unbounded loop will block the main thread, freezing the user\u0027s browser tab and making it unresponsive.\n\n### Attack Preconditions\n\nFor this vulnerability to be exploitable, the following conditions must be met:\n\n1. **Vulnerable Component Usage:** The application must use Angular\u0027s number formatting utilities, such as the `formatNumber` function directly, or via template pipes (`DecimalPipe`, `PercentPipe`, `CurrencyPipe`). \n2. **Attacker-Controlled Parameter:** The `digitsInfo` parameter passed to these utilities must be customizable or directly controlled by untrusted user input (e.g., parsed from query parameters, user preference settings, or API responses that accept user-defined formatting options). If `digitsInfo` is trusted or limited to a known, defined range for its value, the vulnerability is not exploitable by external attackers.\n\n### Patches\n- 22.0.0-rc.2\n- 21.2.15\n- 20.3.22\n- 19.2.23\n\n### Credits\nThis vulnerability was discovered and reported by [CodeMender from Google DeepMind](https://deepmind.google/blog/introducing-codemender-an-ai-agent-for-code-security/).",
"id": "GHSA-p3vc-36g9-x9gr",
"modified": "2026-07-15T22:05:15Z",
"published": "2026-06-15T16:52:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-p3vc-36g9-x9gr"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50171"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/68840"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/angular/angular"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "@angular/common: Denial of Service (DoS) via OOM in Number Formatting (digitsInfo)"
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.