GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-P28Q-GHM8-CW23

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-12-04 15:31 – Updated: 2024-12-11 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sctp: fix possible UAF in sctp_v6_available()

A lockdep report [1] with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y hints that sctp_v6_available() is calling dev_get_by_index_rcu() and ipv6_chk_addr() without holding rcu.

[1] ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc5-virtme #1216 Tainted: G W


net/core/dev.c:876 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by sctp_hello/31495: #0: ffff9f1ebbdb7418 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sctp_bind (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 net/sctp/socket.c:315) sctp

stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 31495 Comm: sctp_hello Tainted: G W 6.12.0-rc5-virtme #1216 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822) dev_get_by_index_rcu (net/core/dev.c:876 (discriminator 7)) sctp_v6_available (net/sctp/ipv6.c:701) sctp sctp_do_bind (net/sctp/socket.c:400 (discriminator 1)) sctp sctp_bind (net/sctp/socket.c:320) sctp inet6_bind_sk (net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:465) ? security_socket_bind (security/security.c:4581 (discriminator 1)) __sys_bind (net/socket.c:1848 net/socket.c:1869) ? do_user_addr_fault (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:880 ./include/linux/mm.h:729 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1340) ? do_user_addr_fault (./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:84 (discriminator 13) ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:98 (discriminator 13) ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:882 (discriminator 13) ./include/linux/mm.h:729 (discriminator 13) arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1340 (discriminator 13)) __x64_sys_bind (net/socket.c:1877 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:1875 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:1875 (discriminator 1)) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) RIP: 0033:0x7f59b934a1e7 Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 15 39 8c 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bd 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 b8 31 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 8c 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 All code ======== 0: 44 00 00 add %r8b,(%rax) 3: 48 8b 15 39 8c 0c 00 mov 0xc8c39(%rip),%rdx # 0xc8c43 a: f7 d8 neg %eax c: 64 89 02 mov %eax,%fs:(%rdx) f: b8 ff ff ff ff mov $0xffffffff,%eax 14: eb bd jmp 0xffffffffffffffd3 16: 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 cs nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 1d: 00 00 00 20: 0f 1f 00 nopl (%rax) 23: b8 31 00 00 00 mov $0x31,%eax 28: 0f 05 syscall 2a:* 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff001,%rax <-- trapping instruction 30: 73 01 jae 0x33 32: c3 ret 33: 48 8b 0d 09 8c 0c 00 mov 0xc8c09(%rip),%rcx # 0xc8c43 3a: f7 d8 neg %eax 3c: 64 89 01 mov %eax,%fs:(%rcx) 3f: 48 rex.W

Code starting with the faulting instruction

0: 48 3d 01 f0 ff ff cmp $0xfffffffffffff001,%rax 6: 73 01 jae 0x9 8: c3 ret 9: 48 8b 0d 09 8c 0c 00 mov 0xc8c09(%rip),%rcx # 0xc8c19 10: f7 d8 neg %eax 12: 64 89 01 mov %eax,%fs:(%rcx) 15: 48 rex.W RSP: 002b:00007ffe2d0ad398 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe2d0ad3d0 RCX: 00007f59b934a1e7 RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 00007ffe2d0ad3d0 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f59b9253298 R11: 000000000000 ---truncated---

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-53139"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-12-04T15:15:15Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsctp: fix possible UAF in sctp_v6_available()\n\nA lockdep report [1] with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y hints\nthat sctp_v6_available() is calling dev_get_by_index_rcu()\nand ipv6_chk_addr() without holding rcu.\n\n[1]\n =============================\n WARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n 6.12.0-rc5-virtme #1216 Tainted: G        W\n -----------------------------\n net/core/dev.c:876 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!\n\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\nrcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1\n 1 lock held by sctp_hello/31495:\n #0: ffff9f1ebbdb7418 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: sctp_bind (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 net/sctp/socket.c:315) sctp\n\nstack backtrace:\n CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 31495 Comm: sctp_hello Tainted: G        W          6.12.0-rc5-virtme #1216\n Tainted: [W]=WARN\n Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014\n Call Trace:\n  \u003cTASK\u003e\n dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)\n lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822)\n dev_get_by_index_rcu (net/core/dev.c:876 (discriminator 7))\n sctp_v6_available (net/sctp/ipv6.c:701) sctp\n sctp_do_bind (net/sctp/socket.c:400 (discriminator 1)) sctp\n sctp_bind (net/sctp/socket.c:320) sctp\n inet6_bind_sk (net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:465)\n ? security_socket_bind (security/security.c:4581 (discriminator 1))\n __sys_bind (net/socket.c:1848 net/socket.c:1869)\n ? do_user_addr_fault (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:880 ./include/linux/mm.h:729 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1340)\n ? do_user_addr_fault (./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:84 (discriminator 13) ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:98 (discriminator 13) ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:882 (discriminator 13) ./include/linux/mm.h:729 (discriminator 13) arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1340 (discriminator 13))\n __x64_sys_bind (net/socket.c:1877 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:1875 (discriminator 1) net/socket.c:1875 (discriminator 1))\n do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1) arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 (discriminator 1))\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)\n RIP: 0033:0x7f59b934a1e7\n Code: 44 00 00 48 8b 15 39 8c 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff eb bd 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 b8 31 00 00 00 0f 05 \u003c48\u003e 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 8c 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48\nAll code\n========\n   0:\t44 00 00             \tadd    %r8b,(%rax)\n   3:\t48 8b 15 39 8c 0c 00 \tmov    0xc8c39(%rip),%rdx        # 0xc8c43\n   a:\tf7 d8                \tneg    %eax\n   c:\t64 89 02             \tmov    %eax,%fs:(%rdx)\n   f:\tb8 ff ff ff ff       \tmov    $0xffffffff,%eax\n  14:\teb bd                \tjmp    0xffffffffffffffd3\n  16:\t66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 \tcs nopw 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)\n  1d:\t00 00 00\n  20:\t0f 1f 00             \tnopl   (%rax)\n  23:\tb8 31 00 00 00       \tmov    $0x31,%eax\n  28:\t0f 05                \tsyscall\n  2a:*\t48 3d 01 f0 ff ff    \tcmp    $0xfffffffffffff001,%rax\t\t\u003c-- trapping instruction\n  30:\t73 01                \tjae    0x33\n  32:\tc3                   \tret\n  33:\t48 8b 0d 09 8c 0c 00 \tmov    0xc8c09(%rip),%rcx        # 0xc8c43\n  3a:\tf7 d8                \tneg    %eax\n  3c:\t64 89 01             \tmov    %eax,%fs:(%rcx)\n  3f:\t48                   \trex.W\n\nCode starting with the faulting instruction\n===========================================\n   0:\t48 3d 01 f0 ff ff    \tcmp    $0xfffffffffffff001,%rax\n   6:\t73 01                \tjae    0x9\n   8:\tc3                   \tret\n   9:\t48 8b 0d 09 8c 0c 00 \tmov    0xc8c09(%rip),%rcx        # 0xc8c19\n  10:\tf7 d8                \tneg    %eax\n  12:\t64 89 01             \tmov    %eax,%fs:(%rcx)\n  15:\t48                   \trex.W\n RSP: 002b:00007ffe2d0ad398 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000031\n RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffe2d0ad3d0 RCX: 00007f59b934a1e7\n RDX: 000000000000001c RSI: 00007ffe2d0ad3d0 RDI: 0000000000000005\n RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000\n R10: 00007f59b9253298 R11: 000000000000\n---truncated---",
  "id": "GHSA-p28q-ghm8-cw23",
  "modified": "2024-12-11T15:31:16Z",
  "published": "2024-12-04T15:31:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-53139"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/05656a66592759242c74063616291b7274d11b2f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ad975697211f4f2c4ce61c3ba524fd14d88ceab8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb72e7fcc83987d5d5595b43222f23b295d5de7f"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…