GHSA-MW3H-QJXJ-6XG9
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-31 18:51 – Updated: 2026-07-31 18:51HMAC validation bypass via multiple .replace() calls when removing URL signature
Summary
Thumbor’s HMAC validation can be bypassed due to the use of Python’s .replace() when removing the signature from the URL before validation. Since .replace() removes all occurrences of the substring, an attacker can insert the same signature multiple times in the URL and manipulate the final URL used for validation.
This allows crafting URLs where the validated string differs from the actual requested resource, enabling loading images from unintended domains or paths.
Details
Thumbor signs URLs using HMAC-SHA1 to prevent abuse such as loading arbitrary external images or invoking filters without authorization.
During request validation, Thumbor removes the signature from the request URL before recalculating the HMAC. The relevant code:
url_signature = self.context.request.hash
if url_signature:
signer = self.context.modules.url_signer(
self.context.server.security_key
)
try:
quoted_hash = quote(self.context.request.hash)
except KeyError:
self._error(400, f"Invalid hash: {self.context.request.hash}")
return
url_to_validate = url.replace(
f"/{self.context.request.hash}/", ""
).replace(f"/{quoted_hash}/", "")
valid = signer.validate(
unquote(url_signature).encode(), url_to_validate
)
The issue is that .replace() removes every occurrence of the substring in the URL, not just the first one.
Because the signature itself appears in the URL, an attacker can inject additional copies of the signature elsewhere in the path. When Thumbor performs .replace(), these extra occurrences are also removed, resulting in a different url_to_validate than the original request.
Example
Valid request:
/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/300x200/s3.glbimg.com/v1/.../image.jpg
By injecting the same hash inside the URL:
/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/300x200/s3.glbimg.co/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/m/v1/.../image.jpg
After .replace() removes all occurrences of the hash, the URL used for validation differs from the effective request path. This allows manipulation of the upstream host or path.
Further manipulation is possible due to the second .replace() for the URL-encoded hash (%3D), enabling more precise path manipulation.
Example:
/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/300x200/s3.glbimg.com/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc%3D/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po/v1/...
Impact
This behavior may allow attackers to:
- Bypass HMAC URL validation
- Load images from arbitrary domains
- Abuse Thumbor deployments as an open proxy / image fetcher
- Circumvent domain restrictions intended by the signed URL mechanism
Root Cause
Use of .replace() without limiting the number of replacements when removing the signature from the URL.
Since the signature is part of the request path, using a global replacement allows attackers to place additional occurrences of the same substring to influence the validated string.
Suggested Fix
Remove only the first occurrence of the signature or explicitly parse the URL components instead of performing global string replacement.
Example:
url.replace(f"/{self.context.request.hash}/", "", 1)
Alternatively, reconstruct the unsigned URL deterministically from the parsed request components.
{
"affected": [
{
"database_specific": {
"last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 7.7.7"
},
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "thumbor"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "7.8.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53501"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-347"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-31T18:51:54Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "# HMAC validation bypass via multiple `.replace()` calls when removing URL signature\n\n## Summary\n\nThumbor\u2019s HMAC validation can be bypassed due to the use of Python\u2019s `.replace()` when removing the signature from the URL before validation. Since `.replace()` removes **all occurrences** of the substring, an attacker can insert the same signature multiple times in the URL and manipulate the final URL used for validation.\n\nThis allows crafting URLs where the validated string differs from the actual requested resource, enabling loading images from unintended domains or paths.\n\n## Details\n\nThumbor signs URLs using **HMAC-SHA1** to prevent abuse such as loading arbitrary external images or invoking filters without authorization.\n\nDuring request validation, Thumbor removes the signature from the request URL before recalculating the HMAC. The relevant code:\n\n```python\nurl_signature = self.context.request.hash\nif url_signature:\n signer = self.context.modules.url_signer(\n self.context.server.security_key\n )\n\n try:\n quoted_hash = quote(self.context.request.hash)\n except KeyError:\n self._error(400, f\"Invalid hash: {self.context.request.hash}\")\n return\n\n url_to_validate = url.replace(\n f\"/{self.context.request.hash}/\", \"\"\n ).replace(f\"/{quoted_hash}/\", \"\")\n\n valid = signer.validate(\n unquote(url_signature).encode(), url_to_validate\n )\n```\n\nThe issue is that `.replace()` removes **every occurrence** of the substring in the URL, not just the first one.\n\nBecause the signature itself appears in the URL, an attacker can **inject additional copies of the signature** elsewhere in the path. When Thumbor performs `.replace()`, these extra occurrences are also removed, resulting in a different `url_to_validate` than the original request.\n\n## Example\n\nValid request:\n\n```\n/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/300x200/s3.glbimg.com/v1/.../image.jpg\n```\n\nBy injecting the same hash inside the URL:\n\n```\n/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/300x200/s3.glbimg.co/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/m/v1/.../image.jpg\n```\n\nAfter `.replace()` removes all occurrences of the hash, the URL used for validation differs from the effective request path. This allows manipulation of the upstream host or path.\n\nFurther manipulation is possible due to the **second `.replace()` for the URL-encoded hash (`%3D`)**, enabling more precise path manipulation.\n\nExample:\n\n```\n/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc=/300x200/s3.glbimg.com/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po_dzOrBhCDrXLc%3D/ddoyYVYUbDf6Po/v1/...\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nThis behavior may allow attackers to:\n\n- Bypass HMAC URL validation\n- Load images from arbitrary domains\n- Abuse Thumbor deployments as an open proxy / image fetcher\n- Circumvent domain restrictions intended by the signed URL mechanism\n\n## Root Cause\n\nUse of `.replace()` without limiting the number of replacements when removing the signature from the URL.\n\nSince the signature is part of the request path, using a global replacement allows attackers to place additional occurrences of the same substring to influence the validated string.\n\n## Suggested Fix\n\nRemove only the first occurrence of the signature or explicitly parse the URL components instead of performing global string replacement.\n\nExample:\n\n```python\nurl.replace(f\"/{self.context.request.hash}/\", \"\", 1)\n```\n\nAlternatively, reconstruct the unsigned URL deterministically from the parsed request components.",
"id": "GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9",
"modified": "2026-07-31T18:51:54Z",
"published": "2026-07-31T18:51:54Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/thumbor/thumbor/security/advisories/GHSA-mw3h-qjxj-6xg9"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/thumbor/thumbor/commit/e3ae3e2500537b4d735df4144129a649374bb70b"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/thumbor/thumbor"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/thumbor/thumbor/releases/tag/7.8.0"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
],
"summary": "Thumbor has HMAC validation bypass via multiple .replace() calls when removing URL signature"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.