GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-MV4H-4H45-G2XR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: flowtable: support IPIP tunnel with direct xmit

The combination of IPIP tunnel with direct xmit, eg. bridge device, breaks because no dst_entry is provided to check the skb headroom and to set the iph->frag_off field. This leads to invalid dst usage and can trigger a crash in the tunnel transmit path.

Fix this by moving dst_cache and dst_cookie out of the runtime union so that they can be shared by neighbour, xfrm, and direct tunnel flows. For FLOW_OFFLOAD_XMIT_DIRECT tuples carrying tunnel metadata, preserve route state in these shared fields and release it through the common dst release path.

Since dst_entry is now available to the three supported xmit modes and dst_release() already deals with NULL dst, remove the xmit type check in nft_flow_dst_release(). Moreover, skip the check if the dst entry is NULL in nf_flow_dst_check() which is now the case for the direct xmit case.

Based on patch from Rein Wei n05ec@lzu.edu.cn.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72248"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:52Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: flowtable: support IPIP tunnel with direct xmit\n\nThe combination of IPIP tunnel with direct xmit, eg. bridge device,\nbreaks because no dst_entry is provided to check the skb headroom and to\nset the iph-\u003efrag_off field. This leads to invalid dst usage and can\ntrigger a crash in the tunnel transmit path.\n\nFix this by moving dst_cache and dst_cookie out of the runtime union so\nthat they can be shared by neighbour, xfrm, and direct tunnel flows.\nFor FLOW_OFFLOAD_XMIT_DIRECT tuples carrying tunnel metadata, preserve\nroute state in these shared fields and release it through the common\ndst release path.\n\nSince dst_entry is now available to the three supported xmit modes and\ndst_release() already deals with NULL dst, remove the xmit type check\nin nft_flow_dst_release(). Moreover, skip the check if the dst entry\nis NULL in nf_flow_dst_check() which is now the case for the direct\nxmit case.\n\nBased on patch from Rein Wei \u003cn05ec@lzu.edu.cn\u003e.",
  "id": "GHSA-mv4h-4h45-g2xr",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:18Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72248"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0880c4ed122d0cddc9f29a2b28f055d1f24f0fca"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa7395c02d95e51bad2952325d2d6503bfbad437"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…