GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-MRW5-54XQ-R399

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-15 06:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipv4: igmp: Fix potential memory leaks in igmp_mod_timer() and igmp_stop_timer()

When a timer is deleted and not re-armed in igmp_mod_timer(), or stopped in igmp_stop_timer(), the code currently decrements the reference counter of the multicast list entry @im using refcount_dec(&im->refcnt).

However, both functions can be called from the RCU reader path: - igmp_mod_timer() via igmp_heard_query() -> for_each_pmc_rcu() - igmp_stop_timer() via igmp_rcv() -> igmp_heard_report()

If the group im was concurrently removed from the list by ip_mc_dec_group(), its reference count might have already been decremented to 1.

In this case, timer_delete() succeeds, and refcount_dec() decrements the refcount from 1 to 0. Since refcount_dec() does not free the object when it hits 0 (unlike ip_ma_put()), the im structure is leaked.

Fix this by using ip_ma_put(im) instead of refcount_dec(&im->refcnt), and deferring the put until after the spinlock is released.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72321"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:22:05Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipv4: igmp: Fix potential memory leaks in igmp_mod_timer() and igmp_stop_timer()\n\nWhen a timer is deleted and not re-armed in igmp_mod_timer(), or stopped\nin igmp_stop_timer(), the code currently decrements the reference counter\nof the multicast list entry @im using refcount_dec(\u0026im-\u003erefcnt).\n\nHowever, both functions can be called from the RCU reader path:\n- igmp_mod_timer() via igmp_heard_query() -\u003e for_each_pmc_rcu()\n- igmp_stop_timer() via igmp_rcv() -\u003e igmp_heard_report()\n\nIf the group im was concurrently removed from the list by ip_mc_dec_group(),\nits reference count might have already been decremented to 1.\n\nIn this case, timer_delete() succeeds, and refcount_dec() decrements\nthe refcount from 1 to 0. Since refcount_dec() does not free the object\nwhen it hits 0 (unlike ip_ma_put()), the im structure is leaked.\n\nFix this by using ip_ma_put(im) instead of refcount_dec(\u0026im-\u003erefcnt),\nand deferring the put until after the spinlock is released.",
  "id": "GHSA-mrw5-54xq-r399",
  "modified": "2026-08-15T06:32:20Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:20Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72321"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3546deaa0c30a14c7cdb5dc8f2432cb428f0cd36"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95128dc74425ec19ed4f2077ccc651e791ff4b75"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f60ec3058a85447008b88b762c859d336163acb3"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…