GHSA-MRJW-9WMF-9MPH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-17 15:30 – Updated: 2025-12-11 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing: Fix race issue between cpu buffer write and swap

Warning happened in rb_end_commit() at code: if (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, !local_read(&cpu_buffer->committing)))

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 139 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:3142 rb_commit+0x402/0x4a0 Call Trace: ring_buffer_unlock_commit+0x42/0x250 trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x3b/0x250 trace_event_buffer_commit+0xe5/0x440 trace_event_buffer_reserve+0x11c/0x150 trace_event_raw_event_sched_switch+0x23c/0x2c0 __traceiter_sched_switch+0x59/0x80 __schedule+0x72b/0x1580 schedule+0x92/0x120 worker_thread+0xa0/0x6f0

It is because the race between writing event into cpu buffer and swapping cpu buffer through file per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot:

Write on CPU 0 Swap buffer by per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot on CPU 1 -------- -------- tracing_snapshot_write() [...]

ring_buffer_lock_reserve() cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu]; // 1. Suppose find 'cpu_buffer_a'; [...] rb_reserve_next_event() [...]

                           ring_buffer_swap_cpu()
                             if (local_read(&cpu_buffer_a->committing))
                                 goto out_dec;
                             if (local_read(&cpu_buffer_b->committing))
                                 goto out_dec;
                             buffer_a->buffers[cpu] = cpu_buffer_b;
                             buffer_b->buffers[cpu] = cpu_buffer_a;
                             // 2. cpu_buffer has swapped here.

  rb_start_commit(cpu_buffer);
  if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer->buffer)
      != buffer)) { // 3. This check passed due to 'cpu_buffer->buffer'
    [...]           //    has not changed here.
    return NULL;
  }
                             cpu_buffer_b->buffer = buffer_a;
                             cpu_buffer_a->buffer = buffer_b;
                             [...]

  // 4. Reserve event from 'cpu_buffer_a'.

ring_buffer_unlock_commit() [...] cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu]; // 5. Now find 'cpu_buffer_b' !!! rb_commit(cpu_buffer) rb_end_commit() // 6. WARN for the wrong 'committing' state !!!

Based on above analysis, we can easily reproduce by following testcase: ``` bash #!/bin/bash

dmesg -n 7 sysctl -w kernel.panic_on_warn=1 TR=/sys/kernel/tracing echo 7 > ${TR}/buffer_size_kb echo "sched:sched_switch" > ${TR}/set_event while [ true ]; do echo 1 > ${TR}/per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot done & while [ true ]; do echo 1 > ${TR}/per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot done & while [ true ]; do echo 1 > ${TR}/per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot done & ```

To fix it, IIUC, we can use smp_call_function_single() to do the swap on the target cpu where the buffer is located, so that above race would be avoided.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-53368"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-362"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-17T15:15:41Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntracing: Fix race issue between cpu buffer write and swap\n\nWarning happened in rb_end_commit() at code:\n\tif (RB_WARN_ON(cpu_buffer, !local_read(\u0026cpu_buffer-\u003ecommitting)))\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 139 at kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:3142\n\trb_commit+0x402/0x4a0\n  Call Trace:\n   ring_buffer_unlock_commit+0x42/0x250\n   trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x3b/0x250\n   trace_event_buffer_commit+0xe5/0x440\n   trace_event_buffer_reserve+0x11c/0x150\n   trace_event_raw_event_sched_switch+0x23c/0x2c0\n   __traceiter_sched_switch+0x59/0x80\n   __schedule+0x72b/0x1580\n   schedule+0x92/0x120\n   worker_thread+0xa0/0x6f0\n\nIt is because the race between writing event into cpu buffer and swapping\ncpu buffer through file per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot:\n\n  Write on CPU 0             Swap buffer by per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot on CPU 1\n  --------                   --------\n                             tracing_snapshot_write()\n                               [...]\n\n  ring_buffer_lock_reserve()\n    cpu_buffer = buffer-\u003ebuffers[cpu]; // 1. Suppose find \u0027cpu_buffer_a\u0027;\n    [...]\n    rb_reserve_next_event()\n      [...]\n\n                               ring_buffer_swap_cpu()\n                                 if (local_read(\u0026cpu_buffer_a-\u003ecommitting))\n                                     goto out_dec;\n                                 if (local_read(\u0026cpu_buffer_b-\u003ecommitting))\n                                     goto out_dec;\n                                 buffer_a-\u003ebuffers[cpu] = cpu_buffer_b;\n                                 buffer_b-\u003ebuffers[cpu] = cpu_buffer_a;\n                                 // 2. cpu_buffer has swapped here.\n\n      rb_start_commit(cpu_buffer);\n      if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(cpu_buffer-\u003ebuffer)\n          != buffer)) { // 3. This check passed due to \u0027cpu_buffer-\u003ebuffer\u0027\n        [...]           //    has not changed here.\n        return NULL;\n      }\n                                 cpu_buffer_b-\u003ebuffer = buffer_a;\n                                 cpu_buffer_a-\u003ebuffer = buffer_b;\n                                 [...]\n\n      // 4. Reserve event from \u0027cpu_buffer_a\u0027.\n\n  ring_buffer_unlock_commit()\n    [...]\n    cpu_buffer = buffer-\u003ebuffers[cpu]; // 5. Now find \u0027cpu_buffer_b\u0027 !!!\n    rb_commit(cpu_buffer)\n      rb_end_commit()  // 6. WARN for the wrong \u0027committing\u0027 state !!!\n\nBased on above analysis, we can easily reproduce by following testcase:\n  ``` bash\n  #!/bin/bash\n\n  dmesg -n 7\n  sysctl -w kernel.panic_on_warn=1\n  TR=/sys/kernel/tracing\n  echo 7 \u003e ${TR}/buffer_size_kb\n  echo \"sched:sched_switch\" \u003e ${TR}/set_event\n  while [ true ]; do\n          echo 1 \u003e ${TR}/per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot\n  done \u0026\n  while [ true ]; do\n          echo 1 \u003e ${TR}/per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot\n  done \u0026\n  while [ true ]; do\n          echo 1 \u003e ${TR}/per_cpu/cpu0/snapshot\n  done \u0026\n  ```\n\nTo fix it, IIUC, we can use smp_call_function_single() to do the swap on\nthe target cpu where the buffer is located, so that above race would be\navoided.",
  "id": "GHSA-mrjw-9wmf-9mph",
  "modified": "2025-12-11T18:30:32Z",
  "published": "2025-09-17T15:30:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-53368"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3163f635b20e9e1fb4659e74f47918c9dddfe64e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37ca1b686078b00cc4ffa008e2190615f7709b5d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6182318ac04648b46db9d441fd7d696337fcdd0b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/74c85396bd73eca80b96510b4edf93b9a3aff75f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/89c89da92a60028013f9539be0dcce7e44405a43"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90e037cabc2c2dfc39b3dd9c5b22ea91f995539a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c5d30d6aa83d99fba8dfdd9cf6c4e4e7a63244db"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.