GHSA-MPC7-4W3V-V47R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 12:30 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: fix posix_acl leak on SETACL decode failure

nfsaclsvc_decode_setaclargs() and nfs3svc_decode_setaclargs() each call nfs_stream_decode_acl() twice, first for NFS_ACL and then for NFS_DFACL. Each successful call transfers ownership of a freshly allocated posix_acl into argp->acl_access or argp->acl_default. If the first call succeeds but the second fails, the decoder returns false and argp->acl_access is left dangling.

ACLPROC2_SETACL.pc_release was wired to nfssvc_release_attrstat and ACLPROC3_SETACL.pc_release was wired to nfs3svc_release_fhandle. Both only call fh_put() and have no knowledge of the ACL fields on argp. The posix_acl_release() pairs sat at the out: labels inside nfsacld_proc_setacl() and nfsd3_proc_setacl(), but svc_process() skips pc_func when pc_decode returns false, so that cleanup is unreachable on decode failure:

svc_process_common()
  pc_decode()                  /* decode_setaclargs: false */
  /* pc_func skipped */
  pc_release()                 /* fh_put only -- ACLs leaked */

The orphaned posix_acl is leaked for the lifetime of the server.

Fix by adding nfsaclsvc_release_setacl() and nfs3svc_release_setacl(), which release both argp->acl_access and argp->acl_default in addition to fh_put(), and wiring them as pc_release for their respective SETACL procedures. pc_release runs on every path svc_process() takes after decode, including decode failure, so the posix_acl_release() pairs are removed from the proc functions' out: labels to keep ownership in one place. This matches the existing release_getacl() pattern used by the sibling GETACL procedures.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53397"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T12:16:50Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnfsd: fix posix_acl leak on SETACL decode failure\n\nnfsaclsvc_decode_setaclargs() and nfs3svc_decode_setaclargs() each\ncall nfs_stream_decode_acl() twice, first for NFS_ACL and then for\nNFS_DFACL.  Each successful call transfers ownership of a freshly\nallocated posix_acl into argp-\u003eacl_access or argp-\u003eacl_default.  If\nthe first call succeeds but the second fails, the decoder returns\nfalse and argp-\u003eacl_access is left dangling.\n\nACLPROC2_SETACL.pc_release was wired to nfssvc_release_attrstat and\nACLPROC3_SETACL.pc_release was wired to nfs3svc_release_fhandle.\nBoth only call fh_put() and have no knowledge of the ACL fields on\nargp.  The posix_acl_release() pairs sat at the out: labels inside\nnfsacld_proc_setacl() and nfsd3_proc_setacl(), but svc_process()\nskips pc_func when pc_decode returns false, so that cleanup is\nunreachable on decode failure:\n\n    svc_process_common()\n      pc_decode()                  /* decode_setaclargs: false */\n      /* pc_func skipped */\n      pc_release()                 /* fh_put only -- ACLs leaked */\n\nThe orphaned posix_acl is leaked for the lifetime of the server.\n\nFix by adding nfsaclsvc_release_setacl() and nfs3svc_release_setacl(),\nwhich release both argp-\u003eacl_access and argp-\u003eacl_default in addition\nto fh_put(), and wiring them as pc_release for their respective SETACL\nprocedures.  pc_release runs on every path svc_process() takes after\ndecode, including decode failure, so the posix_acl_release() pairs are\nremoved from the proc functions\u0027 out: labels to keep ownership in one\nplace.  This matches the existing release_getacl() pattern used by\nthe sibling GETACL procedures.",
  "id": "GHSA-mpc7-4w3v-v47r",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:45Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T12:30:22Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53397"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0853ac544c590880d797b04daa33fcb72b6be0e1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/136b416593f1349cf6f72c8e3d18f0f204ee8545"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1e96239fddcefacf6afe6c498357be68eacbcabc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/887f92ceccf3eacd5f2402db21254d66372fae00"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a5b42c1e4ff2befaa6b96f7cbf32174751eba083"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b2eb1ffd511d1b3c3e21122f97cbbccea411e277"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b94c4be77682aab06d65ca7296149e3bcfb37353"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd69a825485168ef74e815ecb286754b570fdcc7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…