GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-MGW8-PG67-5PW5

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tpm: Make the TPM character devices non-seekable

The TPM character devices expose a sequential command/response interface, but their open handlers leave FMODE_PREAD and FMODE_PWRITE enabled.

After a command leaves a response pending, pread(fd, buf, 16, 0x1400) passes 0x1400 as off to tpm_common_read(). The transfer length is bounded by response_length, but the offset is used unchecked when forming data_buffer + off. A sufficiently large offset therefore causes an out-of-bounds heap read through copy_to_user() and, if the copy succeeds, an out-of-bounds zero-write through the following memset().

Positional I/O does not provide coherent semantics for this interface. An arbitrary pread offset cannot represent how much of a response has been consumed sequentially. The write callback always stores a command at the start of data_buffer, while pwrite() does not update file->f_pos and can leave the sequential read cursor stale.

Call nonseekable_open() from both open handlers. This removes FMODE_PREAD and FMODE_PWRITE, causing positional reads and writes to fail with -ESPIPE before reaching the TPM callbacks, and explicitly marks the files non-seekable. Normal read() and write() continue to use the existing sequential f_pos cursor, leaving the response state machine unchanged.

Tested on Linux 6.12 with KASAN and a swtpm TPM2 device:

  • sequential partial reads returned the complete response
  • pread() and preadv() with offset 0x1400 returned -ESPIPE
  • pwrite() and pwritev() with offset zero returned -ESPIPE
  • the pending response remained intact after the rejected operations
  • a subsequent normal command/response cycle completed normally
  • no KASAN report was produced.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72135"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:30Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ntpm: Make the TPM character devices non-seekable\n\nThe TPM character devices expose a sequential command/response\ninterface, but their open handlers leave FMODE_PREAD and FMODE_PWRITE\nenabled.\n\nAfter a command leaves a response pending, pread(fd, buf, 16, 0x1400)\npasses 0x1400 as *off to tpm_common_read(). The transfer length is\nbounded by response_length, but the offset is used unchecked when\nforming data_buffer + *off. A sufficiently large offset therefore causes\nan out-of-bounds heap read through copy_to_user() and, if the copy\nsucceeds, an out-of-bounds zero-write through the following memset().\n\nPositional I/O does not provide coherent semantics for this interface.\nAn arbitrary pread offset cannot represent how much of a response has\nbeen consumed sequentially. The write callback always stores a command\nat the start of data_buffer, while pwrite() does not update file-\u003ef_pos\nand can leave the sequential read cursor stale.\n\nCall nonseekable_open() from both open handlers. This removes\nFMODE_PREAD and FMODE_PWRITE, causing positional reads and writes to\nfail with -ESPIPE before reaching the TPM callbacks, and explicitly\nmarks the files non-seekable. Normal read() and write() continue to use\nthe existing sequential f_pos cursor, leaving the response state machine\nunchanged.\n\nTested on Linux 6.12 with KASAN and a swtpm TPM2 device:\n\n - sequential partial reads returned the complete response\n - pread() and preadv() with offset 0x1400 returned -ESPIPE\n - pwrite() and pwritev() with offset zero returned -ESPIPE\n - the pending response remained intact after the rejected operations\n - a subsequent normal command/response cycle completed normally\n - no KASAN report was produced.",
  "id": "GHSA-mgw8-pg67-5pw5",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:12Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72135"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/21a13f932972bc9836f58c44fcd47c62abdecd95"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/232dcf908eb7eb9d8046a9597975caf44270966e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/947b773caaa548672184df025271b29bdc80b0f1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9c513dabd4540f811585a2087f23069767a284da"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ada4b9a5087ea7f30dd8e4c6411a4fb6547eb1ed"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dda695fab5e21f923d29e8cb01df256468ddfbd1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ed0ffc2c016629e40ba041ed0424a772d8b02e2c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f20d61c22bcaf172d6790b6500e3838e532e71c8"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…