GHSA-MFP8-JPMH-X36J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-09-11 15:31 – Updated: 2025-11-05 00:31
VLAI
Details

[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]

There are multiple issues related to the handling and accessing of guest memory pages in the viridian code:

  1. A NULL pointer dereference in the updating of the reference TSC area. This is CVE-2025-27466.

  2. A NULL pointer dereference by assuming the SIM page is mapped when a synthetic timer message has to be delivered. This is CVE-2025-58142.

  3. A race in the mapping of the reference TSC page, where a guest can get Xen to free a page while still present in the guest physical to machine (p2m) page tables. This is CVE-2025-58143.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-58142"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-395"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-09-11T14:15:42Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "[This CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the\ntext explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.]\n\nThere are multiple issues related to the handling and accessing of guest\nmemory pages in the viridian code:\n\n 1. A NULL pointer dereference in the updating of the reference TSC area.\n    This is CVE-2025-27466.\n\n 2. A NULL pointer dereference by assuming the SIM page is mapped when\n    a synthetic timer message has to be delivered.  This is\n    CVE-2025-58142.\n\n 3. A race in the mapping of the reference TSC page, where a guest can\n    get Xen to free a page while still present in the guest physical to\n    machine (p2m) page tables.  This is CVE-2025-58143.",
  "id": "GHSA-mfp8-jpmh-x36j",
  "modified": "2025-11-05T00:31:26Z",
  "published": "2025-09-11T15:31:17Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-58142"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-472.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/09/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-472.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.