GHSA-MFHF-9PVP-RC65
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:28 – Updated: 2022-05-01 02:28
VLAI
Details
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Hitachi Business Logic - Container (BLC) P-2443-9114 01-00 through 02-06 on Windows, and P-1M43-9111 01-01 through 02-00 on AIX, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unknown attack vectors in an unspecified input form.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-4577"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-12-29T11:03:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Hitachi Business Logic - Container (BLC) P-2443-9114 01-00 through 02-06 on Windows, and P-1M43-9111 01-01 through 02-00 on AIX, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unknown attack vectors in an unspecified input form.",
"id": "GHSA-mfhf-9pvp-rc65",
"modified": "2022-05-01T02:28:38Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:28:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-4577"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/23876"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/18213"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1015420"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.hitachi-support.com/security_e/vuls_e/HS05-025_e/01-e.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/22062"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16067"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…