GHSA-MCF6-FPVV-XXR4

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-03-27 15:31 – Updated: 2025-10-29 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()

The perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but currently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings when running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:

WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
kernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!

 Call Trace:
  lockdep_rcu_suspicious
  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply
  perf_iterate_ctx
  perf_event_exec
  begin_new_exec
  ? load_elf_phdrs
  load_elf_binary
  ? lock_acquire
  ? find_held_lock
  ? bprm_execve
  bprm_execve
  do_execveat_common.isra.0
  __x64_sys_execve
  do_syscall_64
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe

This protection was previously present but was removed in commit bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling"). Add back the necessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around perf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec().

[ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-21889"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-03-27T15:15:56Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()\n\nThe perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but\ncurrently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings\nwhen running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:\n\n\tWARNING: suspicious RCU usage\n\tkernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!\n\n\t Call Trace:\n\t  lockdep_rcu_suspicious\n\t  ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply\n\t  perf_iterate_ctx\n\t  perf_event_exec\n\t  begin_new_exec\n\t  ? load_elf_phdrs\n\t  load_elf_binary\n\t  ? lock_acquire\n\t  ? find_held_lock\n\t  ? bprm_execve\n\t  bprm_execve\n\t  do_execveat_common.isra.0\n\t  __x64_sys_execve\n\t  do_syscall_64\n\t  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe\n\nThis protection was previously present but was removed in commit\nbd2756811766 (\"perf: Rewrite core context handling\"). Add back the\nnecessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around\nperf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec().\n\n[ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ]",
  "id": "GHSA-mcf6-fpvv-xxr4",
  "modified": "2025-10-29T18:30:28Z",
  "published": "2025-03-27T15:31:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21889"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0fe8813baf4b2e865d3b2c735ce1a15b86002c74"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2475ccad6120546ea45dbcd6cd1f74dc565ef6b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd536566dda9a551fc2a2acfab5313a5bb13ed02"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f390c2eea571945f357a2d3b9fcb1c015767132e"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…