GHSA-M7PM-G64Q-7XF7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 18:31 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: iwlwifi: mvm: fix driver-set TX rates on old devices

On old devices such as 7265D, rates are still encoded in version 1 format, which doesn't use the CCK/OFDM rate index (0-3/0-7) but rather their PLCP value (e.g. 10 for 1 Mbps CCK rate.)

While introducing v3 rates, I changed the driver from internally handling v1 rates and converting to v2, to internally handling v3 and converting to v1 or v2 according to the firmware. I accordingly changed the code in iwl_mvm_mac80211_idx_to_hwrate() to no longer have different values for different APIs. This was correct.

However, I later reverted this part of the change, because it was reported that I had broken beacon rates, causing a FW assert/crash. This caused TX_CMD rates to be set incorrectly, potentially causing a warning when reported back from the device as having been used.

Fix this (hopefully correctly now) by handling beacon rates in the TX_CMD that's embedded in the beacon template command separately. Restore iwl_mvm_mac80211_idx_to_hwrate() to return only the rate index, not PLCP value, fixing the real TX_CMD.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-64176"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T16:17:59Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nwifi: iwlwifi: mvm: fix driver-set TX rates on old devices\n\nOn old devices such as 7265D, rates are still encoded in version 1\nformat, which doesn\u0027t use the CCK/OFDM rate index (0-3/0-7) but\nrather their PLCP value (e.g. 10 for 1 Mbps CCK rate.)\n\nWhile introducing v3 rates, I changed the driver from internally\nhandling v1 rates and converting to v2, to internally handling v3\nand converting to v1 or v2 according to the firmware. I accordingly\nchanged the code in iwl_mvm_mac80211_idx_to_hwrate() to no longer\nhave different values for different APIs. This was correct.\n\nHowever, I later reverted this part of the change, because it was\nreported that I had broken beacon rates, causing a FW assert/crash.\nThis caused TX_CMD rates to be set incorrectly, potentially causing\na warning when reported back from the device as having been used.\n\nFix this (hopefully correctly now) by handling beacon rates in the\nTX_CMD that\u0027s embedded in the beacon template command separately.\nRestore iwl_mvm_mac80211_idx_to_hwrate() to return only the rate\nindex, not PLCP value, fixing the real TX_CMD.",
  "id": "GHSA-m7pm-g64q-7xf7",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:32:02Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T18:31:54Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64176"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b58a79f2cd98156856eb49e8b55db5facdd7e6d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fe92651b44fd3cfc8dcfdaad0e82885c384dada"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb84b5cbcaab3ca0f4e961d92a40ed7f3aac483b"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…