GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-M5RQ-H5XV-G5G9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-15 06:32 – Updated: 2026-08-17 06:33
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

i2c: imx: fix locked bus on SMBus block-read of 0 (IRQ)

SMBus 3.1 6.5.7 allows a Block Read byte count of 0, but the interrupt-driven block-read state machine rejects it as -EPROTO. Worse, it returns without a NACK+STOP: the next receive cycle has already started, so the target keeps holding SDA and the bus stays stuck until a power cycle of this i2c controller.

Accept count=0: NACK the in-flight dummy byte (TXAK) and set msg->len to 2 so i2c_imx_isr_read_continue() emits STOP via its normal last-byte path. The dummy byte is discarded; block-read callers only consume buf[0..count-1].

Reading I2DR has likewise already armed the next byte on the count > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX error path, so NACK it (TXAK) before aborting with -EPROTO; otherwise the failing transfer's STOP cannot complete and the bus stays held.

The atomic path regressed earlier (v3.16) and is fixed separately; this patch covers only the v6.13 state-machine rework.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-72141"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-15T06:21:31Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ni2c: imx: fix locked bus on SMBus block-read of 0 (IRQ)\n\nSMBus 3.1 6.5.7 allows a Block Read byte count of 0, but the\ninterrupt-driven block-read state machine rejects it as -EPROTO. Worse,\nit returns without a NACK+STOP: the next receive cycle has already\nstarted, so the target keeps holding SDA and the bus stays stuck until a\npower cycle of this i2c controller.\n\nAccept count=0: NACK the in-flight dummy byte (TXAK) and set msg-\u003elen to\n2 so i2c_imx_isr_read_continue() emits STOP via its normal last-byte\npath. The dummy byte is discarded; block-read callers only consume\nbuf[0..count-1].\n\nReading I2DR has likewise already armed the next byte on the\ncount \u003e I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX error path, so NACK it (TXAK) before aborting\nwith -EPROTO; otherwise the failing transfer\u0027s STOP cannot complete and\nthe bus stays held.\n\nThe atomic path regressed earlier (v3.16) and is fixed separately; this\npatch covers only the v6.13 state-machine rework.",
  "id": "GHSA-m5rq-h5xv-g5g9",
  "modified": "2026-08-17T06:33:12Z",
  "published": "2026-08-15T06:32:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-72141"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/07fd9385f0d87dff4b34f355f68adf701080cb24"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/56ddfc18ea8f7d77747658892873eb632b2ed530"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d3240f42a667e29262aff76fdebfcdac4980626"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…