GHSA-M36J-GVQP-GM68
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:58 – Updated: 2022-04-29 02:58
VLAI?
Details
Multiple buffer overflows in (1) http.c, (2) http-retr.c, (3) main.c and other code that handles network protocols in ProZilla 1.3.6-r2 and earlier allow remote servers to execute arbitrary code via a long Location header.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2004-1120"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-01-10T05:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple buffer overflows in (1) http.c, (2) http-retr.c, (3) main.c and other code that handles network protocols in ProZilla 1.3.6-r2 and earlier allow remote servers to execute arbitrary code via a long Location header.",
"id": "GHSA-m36j-gvqp-gm68",
"modified": "2022-04-29T02:58:59Z",
"published": "2022-04-29T02:58:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-1120"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/18210"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70090"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2005/dsa-663"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200411-31.xml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/382219"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11734"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…