GHSA-JQGC-M9MV-XQWM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 17:47 – Updated: 2022-05-24 17:47
VLAI?
Details
There is a integer overflow in media_tools/av_parsers.c in the gf_avc_read_pps_bs_internal in GPAC 1.0.1. pps_id may be a negative number, so it will not return. However, avc->pps only has 255 unit, so there is an overflow, which results a crash.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2021-30022"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-190"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2021-04-19T20:15:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "There is a integer overflow in media_tools/av_parsers.c in the gf_avc_read_pps_bs_internal in GPAC 1.0.1. pps_id may be a negative number, so it will not return. However, avc-\u003epps only has 255 unit, so there is an overflow, which results a crash.",
"id": "GHSA-jqgc-m9mv-xqwm",
"modified": "2022-05-24T17:47:50Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T17:47:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-30022"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gpac/gpac/issues/1720"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/gpac/gpac/commit/51cdb67ff7c5f1242ac58c5aa603ceaf1793b788"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…