GHSA-JM3Q-XWGV-HGH8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-28 09:31 – Updated: 2026-08-29 09:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: flowtable: avoid num_encaps underflow on bridge VLAN untag

The DEV_PATH_BR_VLAN_UNTAG case post-decrements info->num_encaps inside WARN_ON_ONCE(). num_encaps is u8, so if it's already 0 the decrement still happens and wraps it to 255. The break only leaves the inner switch -- a later path entry can set info->indev back to a real device, and we end up returning with num_encaps == 255.

nft_dev_forward_path() then walks info.encap[] (size 2) up to num_encaps, which means an OOB stack read and a bogus count copied into the route descriptor.

Should only happen on a malformed bridge path stack, hence the WARN, but worth handling sanely. Move the decrement out of the WARN.

[ While at this, remove the WARN_ON_ONCE since this can only happen with a buggy bridge path stack --pablo ].

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80634"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-28T08:16:48Z",
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnetfilter: flowtable: avoid num_encaps underflow on bridge VLAN untag\n\nThe DEV_PATH_BR_VLAN_UNTAG case post-decrements info-\u003enum_encaps\ninside WARN_ON_ONCE(). num_encaps is u8, so if it\u0027s already 0 the\ndecrement still happens and wraps it to 255. The break only leaves\nthe inner switch -- a later path entry can set info-\u003eindev back to\na real device, and we end up returning with num_encaps == 255.\n\nnft_dev_forward_path() then walks info.encap[] (size 2) up to\nnum_encaps, which means an OOB stack read and a bogus count copied\ninto the route descriptor.\n\nShould only happen on a malformed bridge path stack, hence the WARN,\nbut worth handling sanely. Move the decrement out of the WARN.\n\n[ While at this, remove the WARN_ON_ONCE since this can only happen\n  with a buggy bridge path stack --pablo ].",
  "id": "GHSA-jm3q-xwgv-hgh8",
  "modified": "2026-08-29T09:30:26Z",
  "published": "2026-08-28T09:31:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80634"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f55fa28011c97d6495d5787808db10a8c2d690d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e052f920773b73be49eb4d8702a9f85de7464363"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…