GHSA-JJVW-QJPR-6RPV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-23 15:31 – Updated: 2026-10-24 15:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ext4: don't enable large folios on encrypted inodes
Commit 709f0f1f1bf5 ("ext4: add checks for large folio incompatibilities when BS > PS") disables large folios at mount time if the "encrypt" feature is set. However, enabling that feature on a mounted filesystem circumvents that check, and writing encrypted data results in a crash:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000028 Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work RIP: 0010:ext4_finish_bio+0xf7/0x3e0 Call Trace: ext4_release_io_end+0x51/0x110 ext4_end_io_end+0x4c/0xe0 ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0xb3/0x100
Fix this by disabling large folios on encrypted inodes, as is already done for inodes that use data journaling.
This affects all kernels between v6.19 and v7.2, but it is not needed in v7.3, where the code was significantly refactored.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-98941"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-23T13:17:15Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\next4: don\u0027t enable large folios on encrypted inodes\n\nCommit 709f0f1f1bf5 (\"ext4: add checks for large folio\nincompatibilities when BS \u003e PS\") disables large folios at mount time\nif the \"encrypt\" feature is set. However, enabling that feature on a\nmounted filesystem circumvents that check, and writing encrypted data\nresults in a crash:\n\n BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000028\n Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work\n RIP: 0010:ext4_finish_bio+0xf7/0x3e0\n Call Trace:\n ext4_release_io_end+0x51/0x110\n ext4_end_io_end+0x4c/0xe0\n ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0xb3/0x100\n\nFix this by disabling large folios on encrypted inodes, as is\nalready done for inodes that use data journaling.\n\nThis affects all kernels between v6.19 and v7.2, but it is not needed\nin v7.3, where the code was significantly refactored.",
"id": "GHSA-jjvw-qjpr-6rpv",
"modified": "2026-10-24T15:32:47Z",
"published": "2026-10-23T15:31:31Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98941"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40554d1221e3d2ff2e0d192b74a05d89eb3620e7"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.