GHSA-JJ87-P9C8-FFW2

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-10-03 12:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

media: verisilicon: rockchip: reject AV1 frames exceeding the tile capacity

rockchip_vpu981_av1_dec_set_tile_info() indexes the tile group entry array by tile1 * tile_cols + tile0, reading up to tile_cols * tile_rows entries, lays out one descriptor per tile in the AV1_MAX_TILES tile_info buffer, and programs the real tile_cols / tile_rows into the hardware.

The tile group entry control is a dynamic array sized to the number of entries userspace submitted, independent of tile_cols / tile_rows, so a frame that claims more tiles than entries reads past the array. A frame that claims more than AV1_MAX_TILES tiles also leaves the hardware programmed for more tiles than the descriptor buffer holds.

Reject both in prepare_run(): tile_cols * tile_rows must not exceed the submitted entry count or AV1_MAX_TILES. The entry count is read via v4l2_ctrl_find() (ctrl->elems). This mirrors the bound the mediatek AV1 decoder already enforces.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-97577"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-25T11:17:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmedia: verisilicon: rockchip: reject AV1 frames exceeding the tile capacity\n\nrockchip_vpu981_av1_dec_set_tile_info() indexes the tile group entry\narray by tile1 * tile_cols + tile0, reading up to tile_cols * tile_rows\nentries, lays out one descriptor per tile in the AV1_MAX_TILES tile_info\nbuffer, and programs the real tile_cols / tile_rows into the hardware.\n\nThe tile group entry control is a dynamic array sized to the number of\nentries userspace submitted, independent of tile_cols / tile_rows, so a\nframe that claims more tiles than entries reads past the array. A frame\nthat claims more than AV1_MAX_TILES tiles also leaves the hardware\nprogrammed for more tiles than the descriptor buffer holds.\n\nReject both in prepare_run(): tile_cols * tile_rows must not exceed the\nsubmitted entry count or AV1_MAX_TILES. The entry count is read via\nv4l2_ctrl_find() (ctrl-\u003eelems). This mirrors the bound the mediatek AV1\ndecoder already enforces.",
  "id": "GHSA-jj87-p9c8-ffw2",
  "modified": "2026-10-03T12:31:17Z",
  "published": "2026-09-25T12:31:25Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97577"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/367db8b23c26a913d76ed70457bbcd781c422b49"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40029f7f35397853f8711d6fce1d90a4c7a01f8c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/95ee48eb17c91bd4859b65e0a54e7722f370d0e5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a41babf528f70c9a82ed31cfb5fe19065910f7f0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fd965369220cc160bb20a24991790814bfbab401"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.