GHSA-JF6F-8M48-J65R

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-13 09:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm, swap: don't free a hibernation slot that is in the swap cache

A slot with a folio in the swap cache is freed when the folio leaves the cache, not when its count drops. swap_put_entries_cluster() follows that rule. swap_free_hibernation_slot() does not, it calls __swap_cluster_free_entries() whether or not a folio sits on the slot.

Cluster readahead can put one there. It walks a raw page_cluster sized window of offsets around the faulting entry, and a hibernation slot passes __swap_cache_add_check() because it is not a folio and its count is not zero. Freeing the slot then clears the entry under that folio.

The folio is now unreachable from the swap table, and the offset goes back to the allocator. The folio is still on the LRU though, so reclaim can pick it up later. It then takes the old offset out of folio->swap and overwrites the table entry there, which by then may belong to someone else.

This bug can trigger silent memory corruption, process crashes, or data instability across completely unrelated userspace applications - typically occurring when uswsusp is preparing the hibernation image.

I found this while working on giving hibernation slots their own marker in the swap table, which I had discussed with Kairui. (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/abp7aDgYLrxF3Me8@KASONG-MC4/) As far as I know there are no reports, so there is no Reported-by/Closes to add.

Check for a cached folio before freeing. The slot is then left in the ordinary state where only the swap cache holds it, and it is freed when the folio leaves the cache, either through the reclaim below or through normal reclaim later.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89760"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:20:07Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm, swap: don\u0027t free a hibernation slot that is in the swap cache\n\nA slot with a folio in the swap cache is freed when the folio leaves the\ncache, not when its count drops.  swap_put_entries_cluster() follows that\nrule.  swap_free_hibernation_slot() does not, it calls\n__swap_cluster_free_entries() whether or not a folio sits on the slot.\n\nCluster readahead can put one there.  It walks a raw page_cluster sized\nwindow of offsets around the faulting entry, and a hibernation slot passes\n__swap_cache_add_check() because it is not a folio and its count is not\nzero.  Freeing the slot then clears the entry under that folio.\n\nThe folio is now unreachable from the swap table, and the offset goes back\nto the allocator.  The folio is still on the LRU though, so reclaim can\npick it up later.  It then takes the old offset out of folio-\u003eswap and\noverwrites the table entry there, which by then may belong to someone\nelse.\n\nThis bug can trigger silent memory corruption, process crashes, or data\ninstability across completely unrelated userspace applications - typically\noccurring when uswsusp is preparing the hibernation image.\n\nI found this while working on giving hibernation slots their own marker in\nthe swap table, which I had discussed with Kairui. \n(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/abp7aDgYLrxF3Me8@KASONG-MC4/) As far as\nI know there are no reports, so there is no Reported-by/Closes to add.\n\nCheck for a cached folio before freeing.  The slot is then left in the\nordinary state where only the swap cache holds it, and it is freed when\nthe folio leaves the cache, either through the reclaim below or through\nnormal reclaim later.",
  "id": "GHSA-jf6f-8m48-j65r",
  "modified": "2026-09-13T09:32:30Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:39Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89760"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10d9012e83efedde8718ceaa5053f836e0c8596c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6df73156f2d85746c69adbf13d0f5ea200e0626"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.