GHSA-HXJH-8H5V-FP7M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-11-03 15:32 – Updated: 2026-11-03 15:32Froxlor 2.3.0 before 2.3.15 contains a missing authorization check in the Certificates.add and Certificates.update API commands, which do not verify whether a domain's certificate is Let's Encrypt-managed. Customers with API access can overwrite the managed certificate and private key with an attacker-chosen pair, which a REBUILD_VHOST task deploys to the webserver, breaking HTTPS and desynchronizing ACME automation.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-121434"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-862"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-11-03T15:17:34Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Froxlor 2.3.0 before 2.3.15 contains a missing authorization check in the Certificates.add and Certificates.update API commands, which do not verify whether a domain\u0027s certificate is Let\u0027s Encrypt-managed. Customers with API access can overwrite the managed certificate and private key with an attacker-chosen pair, which a REBUILD_VHOST task deploys to the webserver, breaking HTTPS and desynchronizing ACME automation.",
"id": "GHSA-hxjh-8h5v-fp7m",
"modified": "2026-11-03T15:32:17Z",
"published": "2026-11-03T15:32:17Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/froxlor/froxlor/security/advisories/GHSA-ch7m-649m-x7xg"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-121434"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/froxlor-2.3.0-before-2.3.15-authorization-bypass-via-certificates-update-api"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
]
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.