GHSA-HXJF-XRRG-3WCH
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 03:52 – Updated: 2022-05-02 03:52
VLAI?
Details
Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Mp3 Tag Assistant Professional 2.92 build 300 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an MP3 file with a long string in the (1) ID3v1, (2) ID3v2, or (3) APEv2 metadata field.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2009-4201"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2009-12-04T19:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Mp3 Tag Assistant Professional 2.92 build 300 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an MP3 file with a long string in the (1) ID3v1, (2) ID3v2, or (3) APEv2 metadata field.",
"id": "GHSA-hxjf-xrrg-3wch",
"modified": "2022-05-02T03:52:41Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T03:52:41Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-4201"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/50870"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://liquidworm.blogspot.com/2009/05/mp3-tag-assistant-pro-292-tag-metadata.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/54810"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/35305"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…