GHSA-HXH5-F5FJ-62C3

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-13 01:08 – Updated: 2022-05-13 01:08
VLAI
Details

A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in tools/files/importers/remote.php in concrete5 8.2.0 can lead to attacks on the local network and mapping of the internal network, because of URL functionality on the File Manager page.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2018-13790"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-918"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2018-07-09T20:29:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in tools/files/importers/remote.php in concrete5 8.2.0 can lead to attacks on the local network and mapping of the internal network, because of URL functionality on the File Manager page.",
  "id": "GHSA-hxh5-f5fj-62c3",
  "modified": "2022-05-13T01:08:37Z",
  "published": "2022-05-13T01:08:37Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13790"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://hackerone.com/reports/243865"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…