GHSA-HWPP-QFQF-G7FR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 06:41 – Updated: 2025-04-03 04:26
VLAI
Details

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Oracle 10g Release 1 before CPU Jan 2006 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via multiple parameters in (1) ATTACH_JOB, (2) HAS_PRIVS, and (3) OPEN_JOB functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT package; and (4) UPDATE_JOB, (5) ACTIVE_JOB, (6) ATTACH_POSSIBLE, (7) ATTACH_TO_JOB, (8) CREATE_NEW_JOB, (9) DELETE_JOB, (10) DELETE_MASTER_TABLE, (11) DETACH_JOB, (12) GET_JOB_INFO, (13) GET_JOB_QUEUES, (14) GET_SOLE_JOBNAME, (15) MASTER_TBL_LOCK, and (16) VALID_HANDLE functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT_INT package. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that these issues has been addressed by Oracle. It is unclear which, if any, Oracle Vuln# identifiers apply to these issues.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2006-0586"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-89"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2006-02-08T01:02:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Oracle 10g Release 1 before CPU Jan 2006 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via multiple parameters in (1) ATTACH_JOB, (2) HAS_PRIVS, and (3) OPEN_JOB functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT package; and (4) UPDATE_JOB, (5) ACTIVE_JOB, (6) ATTACH_POSSIBLE, (7) ATTACH_TO_JOB, (8) CREATE_NEW_JOB, (9) DELETE_JOB, (10) DELETE_MASTER_TABLE, (11) DETACH_JOB, (12) GET_JOB_INFO, (13) GET_JOB_QUEUES, (14) GET_SOLE_JOBNAME, (15) MASTER_TBL_LOCK, and (16) VALID_HANDLE functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT_INT package.  NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that these issues has been addressed by Oracle.  It is unclear which, if any, Oracle Vuln# identifiers apply to these issues.",
  "id": "GHSA-hwpp-qfqf-g7fr",
  "modified": "2025-04-03T04:26:16Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T06:41:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-0586"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24195"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/24197"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-January/041498.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2006-January/041499.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/22839"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/22840"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_cpu_jan_2006.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_sql_injection_kupv$ft.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_sql_injection_kupv$ft_int.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_sql_injection_kupv%24ft.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.red-database-security.com/advisory/oracle_sql_injection_kupv%24ft_int.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/422423/30/7370/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/422424/30/7370/threaded"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16294"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…