GHSA-HR73-3GPV-HH6Q

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 20:30 – Updated: 2026-09-17 20:30
VLAI
Summary
Steeltoe.Discovery.Eureka: malformed enum/bool/timestamp field aborts entire registry fetch (DoS)
Details

Summary

Steeltoe's Eureka discovery client deserializes the registry response as a single unit. If any registered instance contains a field value that cannot be parsed (for example, an unrecognized actionType, a non-boolean value for isCoordinatingDiscoveryServer, or a non-numeric timestamp), deserialization of the entire registry fails. All Steeltoe Eureka clients connected to that registry then receive an empty or stale instance list until the malformed registration is removed.

This is a related but distinct issue from CVE-2026-50196, which addressed only the DataCenterInfo.name field.

Impact

Any principal that can register or update a service instance in the Eureka registry can trigger a service-discovery outage for all Steeltoe applications connected to the same registry. The outage persists until the offending registration is removed.

Affected configuration

  • Application uses EurekaDiscoveryClient (any deployment, including self-hosted Eureka).
  • The registry contains at least one service instance with an unrecognized value in a field such as actionType, status, isCoordinatingDiscoveryServer, or timestamp fields.
  • Mixed-platform environments — for example, Java or Spring services co-existing in the same Eureka registry — are more likely to encounter this condition.

Mitigations

If an immediate upgrade is not possible:

  • Audit the Eureka registry for registrations containing non-standard field values, particularly those originating from non-.NET clients.
  • Restrict write access to the Eureka registration API to trusted services.
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "database_specific": {
        "last_known_affected_version_range": "\u003c= 4.2.0"
      },
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "NuGet",
        "name": "Steeltoe.Discovery.Eureka"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "4.0.0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "4.3.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-81515"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-755"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-17T20:30:45Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T16:17:46Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "## Summary\n\nSteeltoe\u0027s Eureka discovery client deserializes the registry response as a single unit. If any registered instance contains a field value that cannot be parsed (for example, an unrecognized `actionType`, a non-boolean value for `isCoordinatingDiscoveryServer`, or a non-numeric timestamp), deserialization of the entire registry fails. All Steeltoe Eureka clients connected to that registry then receive an empty or stale instance list until the malformed registration is removed.\n\nThis is a related but distinct issue from [CVE-2026-50196](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j8ph-6fxj-g533), which addressed only the `DataCenterInfo.name` field.\n\n## Impact\n\nAny principal that can register or update a service instance in the Eureka registry can trigger a service-discovery outage for all Steeltoe applications connected to the same registry. The outage persists until the offending registration is removed.\n\n## Affected configuration\n\n* Application uses `EurekaDiscoveryClient` (any deployment, including self-hosted Eureka).\n* The registry contains at least one service instance with an unrecognized value in a field such as `actionType`, `status`, `isCoordinatingDiscoveryServer`, or timestamp fields.\n* Mixed-platform environments \u2014 for example, Java or Spring services co-existing in the same Eureka registry \u2014 are more likely to encounter this condition.\n\n## Mitigations\n\nIf an immediate upgrade is not possible:\n\n* Audit the Eureka registry for registrations containing non-standard field values, particularly those originating from non-.NET clients.\n* Restrict write access to the Eureka registration API to trusted services.",
  "id": "GHSA-hr73-3gpv-hh6q",
  "modified": "2026-09-17T20:30:46Z",
  "published": "2026-09-17T20:30:45Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-hr73-3gpv-hh6q"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81515"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/Steeltoe/commit/bc1c3763aacc1fee82ef9932f338ec08dcb00432"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/Steeltoe/releases/tag/4.3.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/SteeltoeOSS/security-advisories"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-j8ph-6fxj-g533"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "Steeltoe.Discovery.Eureka: malformed enum/bool/timestamp field aborts entire registry fetch (DoS)"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
How durations are calculated

Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.

Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.

Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.