GHSA-HQMW-J6G2-75M9

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-18 18:31 – Updated: 2026-10-24 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: SEV: Do cache maintenance on the source VM during intra-host migration

Manually perform cache maintenance on the source VM during intra-host migration to ensure no stale data is left in CPU caches after the VM is destroyed. Because the source VM is "converted" to a non-SEV VM, KVM's memory reclaim flows won't trigger cache maintenance, e.g. when all guest memory is reclaimed in response to detaching from the mmu_notifier.

Note, relying on the destination VM to do cache maintenance isn't an option as KVM doesn't require identical guest memory configurations, i.e. the source VM may have access to memory that the destination VM does not. Enforcing equivalent memory configurations is infeasible, as it would require a deep comparison of memslots, e.g. to verify that not only are the memslot identical, but what the memslots point at is also identical.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-98471"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-10-18T16:16:57Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: SEV: Do cache maintenance on the source VM during intra-host migration\n\nManually perform cache maintenance on the source VM during intra-host\nmigration to ensure no stale data is left in CPU caches after the VM is\ndestroyed.  Because the source VM is \"converted\" to a non-SEV VM, KVM\u0027s\nmemory reclaim flows won\u0027t trigger cache maintenance, e.g. when all guest\nmemory is reclaimed in response to detaching from the mmu_notifier.\n\nNote, relying on the destination VM to do cache maintenance isn\u0027t an option\nas KVM doesn\u0027t require identical guest memory configurations, i.e. the\nsource VM may have access to memory that the destination VM does not.\nEnforcing equivalent memory configurations is infeasible, as it would\nrequire a *deep* comparison of memslots, e.g. to verify that not only are\nthe memslot identical, but what the memslots point at is also identical.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqmw-j6g2-75m9",
  "modified": "2026-10-24T15:32:46Z",
  "published": "2026-10-18T18:31:50Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98471"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/37dfb676fafd1eef36fe0bb649607afbb0d5521b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93de2a6a4b91b72607136dd656edf03fb399d27f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d4cc2dff12116a700add601c0262132cc26e1b2c"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline

Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC

JSON
Events included in the timeline

Loading timeline…


    Loading…

    Loading…

    Loading…

    Related by attack behaviour

    Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.