GHSA-HQGQ-RV4F-6J99

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-04-29 02:58 – Updated: 2022-04-29 02:58
VLAI?
Details

Buffer overflow in layer2.c in mpg123 0.59r and possibly mpg123 0.59s allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a certain (1) mp3 or (2) mp2 file.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2004-0805"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2004-12-23T05:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Buffer overflow in layer2.c in mpg123 0.59r and possibly mpg123 0.59s allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a certain (1) mp3 or (2) mp2 file.",
  "id": "GHSA-hqgq-rv4f-6j99",
  "modified": "2022-04-29T02:58:24Z",
  "published": "2022-04-29T02:58:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2004-0805"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/17287"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2004-September/026151.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.alighieri.org/advisories/advisory-mpg123.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2004/dsa-564"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-200409-20.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKSA-2004:100"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/374433"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/11121"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…