GHSA-HFHX-25R6-4MCJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:18 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:18
VLAI
Details
** DISPUTED ** PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in contxtd.class.php in the Contacts XTD (ContXTD) component for Mambo (com_contxtd) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter. NOTE: another researcher has disputed this issue, saying that the software prevents the attack by checking whether _VALID_MOS is defined.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-4375"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-08-26T21:04:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "** DISPUTED ** PHP remote file inclusion vulnerability in contxtd.class.php in the Contacts XTD (ContXTD) component for Mambo (com_contxtd) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code via a URL in the mosConfig_absolute_path parameter. NOTE: another researcher has disputed this issue, saying that the software prevents the attack by checking whether _VALID_MOS is defined.",
"id": "GHSA-hfhx-25r6-4mcj",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:18:00Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:18:00Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4375"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1451"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.osvdb.org/28091"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/443892/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444063/100/0/threaded"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…