GHSA-HC4W-748F-RGGP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:28 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:28
VLAI
Details

Memory leak in Cisco IOS 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.2, and Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 7.x, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted response to a SIP SUBSCRIBE message, aka Bug IDs CSCto93837 and CSCtj61883.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-4019"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-05-03T10:11:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Memory leak in Cisco IOS 12.4 and 15.0 through 15.2, and Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 7.x, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a crafted response to a SIP SUBSCRIBE message, aka Bug IDs CSCto93837 and CSCtj61883.",
  "id": "GHSA-hc4w-748f-rggp",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:28:57Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:28:57Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4019"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/15_1/release/notes/151TCAVS.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074295/90289/cucm-readme-715bsu5.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…