GHSA-H9PQ-RX2J-X4C7
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-04 00:29 – Updated: 2022-05-04 00:29
VLAI
Details
Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 does not recognize the vrf-also keyword during enforcement of access-class commands, which allows remote attackers to establish SSH connections from arbitrary source IP addresses via a standard SSH client, aka Bug ID CSCsv86113.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2012-0338"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2012-05-02T10:09:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Cisco IOS 12.2 through 12.4 and 15.0 does not recognize the vrf-also keyword during enforcement of access-class commands, which allows remote attackers to establish SSH connections from arbitrary source IP addresses via a standard SSH client, aka Bug ID CSCsv86113.",
"id": "GHSA-h9pq-rx2j-x4c7",
"modified": "2022-05-04T00:29:33Z",
"published": "2022-05-04T00:29:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-0338"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2030226"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SX/release/notes/caveats_SXH_rebuilds.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027005"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…