GHSA-H9J7-FW85-WM4J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-10-18 18:31 – Updated: 2026-10-18 18:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
smb: client: clean up failed cached directory opens
open_cached_dir() sends CREATE and QUERY_INFO as a compound request. If the CREATE succeeds but a later command returns an error, the function must retain the CREATE FID so common cleanup can issue SMB2_close(). It also must not treat a response error as a valid CREATE.
Validate the CREATE response before using its fields, record the FIDs, and mark the handle open before handling errors from later compound commands. Move the -EREMCHG reconnect handling before response validation so a missing response does not hide the reconnect request. Count the handle when it is marked open; confirmed close responses decrement the counter, while existing close retry behavior remains best effort on transport failures.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-98452"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-10-18T16:16:55Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nsmb: client: clean up failed cached directory opens\n\nopen_cached_dir() sends CREATE and QUERY_INFO as a compound request. If\nthe CREATE succeeds but a later command returns an error, the function\nmust retain the CREATE FID so common cleanup can issue SMB2_close(). It\nalso must not treat a response error as a valid CREATE.\n\nValidate the CREATE response before using its fields, record the FIDs, and\nmark the handle open before handling errors from later compound commands.\nMove the -EREMCHG reconnect handling before response validation so a\nmissing response does not hide the reconnect request. Count the handle\nwhen it is marked open; confirmed close responses decrement the counter,\nwhile existing close retry behavior remains best effort on transport\nfailures.",
"id": "GHSA-h9j7-fw85-wm4j",
"modified": "2026-10-18T18:31:49Z",
"published": "2026-10-18T18:31:49Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98452"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48958ddda3d7eee3600261e2d90671f63e055dc4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7c1509598a4fdfb54cb09ce33e4405bd6dbd8295"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/abab661eed00fa102d3c35ddf1cce4f687e718c1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d2ff5fb93ea83034025850266b5eed391f96b825"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.