GHSA-H4PV-4JH4-MXPF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-28 12:30 – Updated: 2026-05-28 12:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipmi: Add limits to event and receive message requests

The driver would just fetch events and receive messages until the BMC said it was done. To avoid issues with BMCs that never say they are done, add a limit of 10 fetches at a time.

In addition, an si interface has an attn state it can return from the hardware which is supposed to cause a flag fetch to see if the driver needs to fetch events or message or a few other things. If the attn bit gets stuck, it's a similar problem. So allow messages in between flag fetches so the driver itself doesn't get stuck.

This is a more general fix than the previous fix for the specific bad BMC, but should fix the more general issue of a BMC that won't stop saying it has data.

This has been there from the beginning of the driver. It's not a bug per-se, but it is accounting for bugs in BMCs.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-46177"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-05-28T10:16:33Z",
    "severity": null
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nipmi: Add limits to event and receive message requests\n\nThe driver would just fetch events and receive messages until the\nBMC said it was done.  To avoid issues with BMCs that never say they are\ndone, add a limit of 10 fetches at a time.\n\nIn addition, an si interface has an attn state it can return from the\nhardware which is supposed to cause a flag fetch to see if the driver\nneeds to fetch events or message or a few other things.  If the attn\nbit gets stuck, it\u0027s a similar problem.  So allow messages in between\nflag fetches so the driver itself doesn\u0027t get stuck.\n\nThis is a more general fix than the previous fix for the specific bad\nBMC, but should fix the more general issue of a BMC that won\u0027t stop\nsaying it has data.\n\nThis has been there from the beginning of the driver.  It\u0027s not a bug\nper-se, but it is accounting for bugs in BMCs.",
  "id": "GHSA-h4pv-4jh4-mxpf",
  "modified": "2026-05-28T12:30:31Z",
  "published": "2026-05-28T12:30:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46177"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3d37d2165df9504ea99d9e6181552dc4d2d1ab37"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/67c44e0deba936d5edaebea356b4589eb43acb5c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c024167fb00489baee08c72182ca2e7dc5fb9f20"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c4cca236968683eb0d59abfb12d5c7e4d8514227"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e20212b431bef217d3886b86bbc90cc3ed00de68"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…