GHSA-H3C4-5G8F-WF66

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-01-15 15:31 – Updated: 2025-11-03 21:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/uverbs: Prevent integer overflow issue

In the expression "cmd.wqe_size * cmd.wr_count", both variables are u32 values that come from the user so the multiplication can lead to integer wrapping. Then we pass the result to uverbs_request_next_ptr() which also could potentially wrap. The "cmd.sge_count * sizeof(struct ib_uverbs_sge)" multiplication can also overflow on 32bit systems although it's fine on 64bit systems.

This patch does two things. First, I've re-arranged the condition in uverbs_request_next_ptr() so that the use controlled variable "len" is on one side of the comparison by itself without any math. Then I've modified all the callers to use size_mul() for the multiplications.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-57890"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-190"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-01-15T13:15:13Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/uverbs: Prevent integer overflow issue\n\nIn the expression \"cmd.wqe_size * cmd.wr_count\", both variables are u32\nvalues that come from the user so the multiplication can lead to integer\nwrapping.  Then we pass the result to uverbs_request_next_ptr() which also\ncould potentially wrap.  The \"cmd.sge_count * sizeof(struct ib_uverbs_sge)\"\nmultiplication can also overflow on 32bit systems although it\u0027s fine on\n64bit systems.\n\nThis patch does two things.  First, I\u0027ve re-arranged the condition in\nuverbs_request_next_ptr() so that the use controlled variable \"len\" is on\none side of the comparison by itself without any math.  Then I\u0027ve modified\nall the callers to use size_mul() for the multiplications.",
  "id": "GHSA-h3c4-5g8f-wf66",
  "modified": "2025-11-03T21:32:12Z",
  "published": "2025-01-15T15:31:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-57890"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/346db03e9926ab7117ed9bf19665699c037c773c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/42a6eb4ed7a9a41ba0b83eb0c7e0225b5fca5608"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b3ef4ae713360501182695dd47d6b4f6e1a43eb8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b92667f755749cf10d9ef1088865c555ae83ffb7"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c2f961c46ea0e5274c5c320d007c2dd949cf627a"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c57721b24bd897338a81a0ca5fff41600f0f1ad1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0257e089d1bbd35c69b6c97ff73e3690ab149a9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00001.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…