GHSA-GXXM-RHPX-J39M
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-10 18:31 – Updated: 2025-11-05 00:31Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via mod_rewrite or apache expressions that pass unvalidated request input.
This issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.63.
Note: The Apache HTTP Server Project will be setting a higher bar for accepting vulnerability reports regarding SSRF via UNC paths.
The server offers limited protection against administrators directing the server to open UNC paths. Windows servers should limit the hosts they will connect over via SMB based on the nature of NTLM authentication.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-43394"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-07-10T17:15:46Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)\u00a0in Apache HTTP Server on Windows allows to potentially leak NTLM hashes to a malicious server via\u00a0\nmod_rewrite or apache expressions that pass unvalidated request input.\n\nThis issue affects Apache HTTP Server: from 2.4.0 through 2.4.63.\n\nNote: \u00a0The Apache HTTP Server Project will be setting a higher bar for accepting vulnerability reports regarding SSRF via UNC paths. \n\nThe server offers limited protection against administrators directing the server to open UNC paths.\nWindows servers should limit the hosts they will connect over via SMB based on the nature of NTLM authentication.",
"id": "GHSA-gxxm-rhpx-j39m",
"modified": "2025-11-05T00:31:20Z",
"published": "2025-07-10T18:31:26Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-43394"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_24.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/08/msg00009.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/07/10/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/07/10/5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.