GHSA-GRRC-M4H5-R55J
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-06-28 09:31
VLAI
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: phy: clean the sfp upstream if phy probing fails
Sashiko reported that we don't call sfp_bus_del_upstream() in the probe failure path, so let's add it, otherwise the sfp-bus is left with a dangling 'upstream' field, that may be used later on during SFP events.
This issue existed before the generic phylib sfp support, back when drivers were calling phy_sfp_probe themselves.
Severity
8.8 (High)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53232"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:41Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: phy: clean the sfp upstream if phy probing fails\n\nSashiko reported that we don\u0027t call sfp_bus_del_upstream() in the probe\nfailure path, so let\u0027s add it, otherwise the sfp-bus is left with a\ndangling \u0027upstream\u0027 field, that may be used later on during SFP events.\n\nThis issue existed before the generic phylib sfp support, back when\ndrivers were calling phy_sfp_probe themselves.",
"id": "GHSA-grrc-m4h5-r55j",
"modified": "2026-06-28T09:31:46Z",
"published": "2026-06-25T09:31:21Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53232"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48774e87bbaa0056819d4b52301e4692e50e3252"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…