GHSA-GRRC-M4H5-R55J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-25 09:31 – Updated: 2026-06-28 09:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: phy: clean the sfp upstream if phy probing fails

Sashiko reported that we don't call sfp_bus_del_upstream() in the probe failure path, so let's add it, otherwise the sfp-bus is left with a dangling 'upstream' field, that may be used later on during SFP events.

This issue existed before the generic phylib sfp support, back when drivers were calling phy_sfp_probe themselves.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-53232"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-25T09:16:41Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnet: phy: clean the sfp upstream if phy probing fails\n\nSashiko reported that we don\u0027t call sfp_bus_del_upstream() in the probe\nfailure path, so let\u0027s add it, otherwise the sfp-bus is left with a\ndangling \u0027upstream\u0027 field, that may be used later on during SFP events.\n\nThis issue existed before the generic phylib sfp support, back when\ndrivers were calling phy_sfp_probe themselves.",
  "id": "GHSA-grrc-m4h5-r55j",
  "modified": "2026-06-28T09:31:46Z",
  "published": "2026-06-25T09:31:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53232"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48774e87bbaa0056819d4b52301e4692e50e3252"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…