GHSA-GPP3-G5WP-8XHW

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 12:30 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

apparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop

aa_replace_profiles() walks ns->rawdata_list to dedup the incoming policy blob against entries already attached to existing profiles. Per the kernel-doc on struct aa_loaddata, list membership does not hold a reference: profiles hold pcount, and when the last pcount drops, do_ploaddata_rmfs() is queued on a workqueue that takes ns->lock and removes the entry. Between dropping the last pcount and the workqueue running, an entry remains on the list with pcount == 0.

aa_get_profile_loaddata() is an unconditional kref_get() on pcount, so when the dedup loop hits such an entry, refcount hardening reports

refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.

inside aa_replace_profiles(), and the poisoned counter then trips "saturated" and "underflow" warnings on the subsequent uses of the same loaddata.

Before commit a0b7091c4de4 ("apparmor: fix race on rawdata dereference") the dedup path used a get_unless_zero-style helper on a single counter, so the existing "if (tmp)" guard was meaningful. The split-refcount refactor introduced aa_get_profile_loaddata(), which has plain kref_get() semantics, and the guard quietly became a no-op.

Introduce aa_get_profile_loaddata_not0(), matching the existing _not0 convention used by aa_get_profile_not0(), and use it for the rawdata_list dedup lookup so dying entries are skipped.

Reproduced on x86_64 with v7.1-rc5 in QEMU+KVM running Ubuntu 24.04 + stress-ng 0.17.06:

stress-ng --apparmor 1 --klog-check --timeout 60s

Without this patch the three refcount_t warnings fire within a few seconds. With it the same 60 s run is clean. Coverage is a smoke-test only; a longer soak with CONFIG_KASAN, CONFIG_KCSAN and CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING would be welcome from anyone with the cycles.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-63827"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T12:16:55Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\napparmor: fix use-after-free in rawdata dedup loop\n\naa_replace_profiles() walks ns-\u003erawdata_list to dedup the incoming\npolicy blob against entries already attached to existing profiles.\nPer the kernel-doc on struct aa_loaddata, list membership does not\nhold a reference: profiles hold pcount, and when the last pcount\ndrops, do_ploaddata_rmfs() is queued on a workqueue that takes\nns-\u003elock and removes the entry. Between dropping the last pcount\nand the workqueue running, an entry remains on the list with\npcount == 0.\n\naa_get_profile_loaddata() is an unconditional kref_get() on\npcount, so when the dedup loop hits such an entry, refcount\nhardening reports\n\n  refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.\n\ninside aa_replace_profiles(), and the poisoned counter then\ntrips \"saturated\" and \"underflow\" warnings on the subsequent\nuses of the same loaddata.\n\nBefore commit a0b7091c4de4 (\"apparmor: fix race on rawdata\ndereference\") the dedup path used a get_unless_zero-style helper\non a single counter, so the existing \"if (tmp)\" guard was\nmeaningful. The split-refcount refactor introduced\naa_get_profile_loaddata(), which has plain kref_get() semantics,\nand the guard quietly became a no-op.\n\nIntroduce aa_get_profile_loaddata_not0(), matching the existing\n_not0 convention used by aa_get_profile_not0(), and use it for\nthe rawdata_list dedup lookup so dying entries are skipped.\n\nReproduced on x86_64 with v7.1-rc5 in QEMU+KVM running Ubuntu\n24.04 + stress-ng 0.17.06:\n\n  stress-ng --apparmor 1 --klog-check --timeout 60s\n\nWithout this patch the three refcount_t warnings fire within a\nfew seconds. With it the same 60 s run is clean. Coverage is a\nsmoke-test only; a longer soak with CONFIG_KASAN, CONFIG_KCSAN\nand CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING would be welcome from anyone with the\ncycles.",
  "id": "GHSA-gpp3-g5wp-8xhw",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:47Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T12:30:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63827"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/15fd83a1e42ede15070968806bb6c8b1a5170688"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5e34fa9f6f7cd688ae153fff13139a5cf2d42339"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f060496d03e4dc560a40f73770bd08335cb7a27"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7a2890028f16e5b0af0bb005d80fcb32559cca3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c3ca2631073b2cef06824fd2bfc452ff7a1023de"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce261a20b41db522e320a41bbf1292bf85af66df"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…