GHSA-GMW9-258Q-R8GM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-18 09:31 – Updated: 2026-09-18 09:31Apache Airflow's asset queued-events DELETE endpoints checked the caller's Dag-axis permission with READ instead of EDIT. Any authenticated user who could read a Dag could therefore delete that Dag's queued asset events, silently suppressing asset-triggered scheduling for it — a state-changing action gated on a read-only permission. Deployments are affected whenever asset-triggered scheduling is in use and Dag read access is granted more widely than Dag edit access, which is the normal RBAC arrangement; no special configuration is required. Upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.2 or later.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-75157"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-863"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-18T08:17:01Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "Apache Airflow\u0027s asset queued-events DELETE endpoints checked the caller\u0027s Dag-axis permission with `READ` instead of `EDIT`. Any authenticated user who could read a Dag could therefore delete that Dag\u0027s queued asset events, silently suppressing asset-triggered scheduling for it \u2014 a state-changing action gated on a read-only permission. Deployments are affected whenever asset-triggered scheduling is in use and Dag read access is granted more widely than Dag edit access, which is the normal RBAC arrangement; no special configuration is required. Upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.2 or later.",
"id": "GHSA-gmw9-258q-r8gm",
"modified": "2026-09-18T09:31:07Z",
"published": "2026-09-18T09:31:07Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75157"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/71736"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.apache.org/thread/f2ngj296z48b3x14ss3pgbs41lbnlgmp"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/18/1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.