GHSA-GMRW-X43X-R9QF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-25 12:31 – Updated: 2026-09-25 12:31In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
configfs: unhash the dentry before dropping the item in rmdir
configfs_get_config_item() treats a hashed dentry as proof that sd->s_element is a live config_item. configfs_rmdir() breaks that: simple_rmdir() leaves the dentry hashed, the last reference to the item is dropped right after, and the dentry is only unhashed by d_delete() once ->rmdir() has returned. configfs_symlink() resolves its target holding no lock on it, so get_target() can land in that window:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in config_item_get+0x26/0x90 get_target fs/configfs/symlink.c:128 [inline] configfs_symlink+0x4ab/0x1030 fs/configfs/symlink.c:185
Unhash in configfs_remove_dir(), while the item is still guaranteed to be there. A reference obtained just before that stays harmless, as create_link() rechecks CONFIGFS_USET_DROPPING, already set by configfs_detach_prep(). Both configfs_unregister_subsystem() paths d_drop() after detaching, so this only makes rmdir match them.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-97949"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-25T11:17:22Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nconfigfs: unhash the dentry before dropping the item in rmdir\n\nconfigfs_get_config_item() treats a hashed dentry as proof that\nsd-\u003es_element is a live config_item. configfs_rmdir() breaks that:\nsimple_rmdir() leaves the dentry hashed, the last reference to the item is\ndropped right after, and the dentry is only unhashed by d_delete() once\n-\u003ermdir() has returned. configfs_symlink() resolves its target holding no\nlock on it, so get_target() can land in that window:\n\n BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in config_item_get+0x26/0x90\n get_target fs/configfs/symlink.c:128 [inline]\n configfs_symlink+0x4ab/0x1030 fs/configfs/symlink.c:185\n\nUnhash in configfs_remove_dir(), while the item is still guaranteed to be\nthere. A reference obtained just before that stays harmless, as\ncreate_link() rechecks CONFIGFS_USET_DROPPING, already set by\nconfigfs_detach_prep(). Both configfs_unregister_subsystem() paths\nd_drop() after detaching, so this only makes rmdir match them.",
"id": "GHSA-gmrw-x43x-r9qf",
"modified": "2026-09-25T12:31:29Z",
"published": "2026-09-25T12:31:29Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97949"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d7cbfb65e47cc71d5d94d87d5d0d1679080f3eb"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/925d8564f1b2d9b46c5ab63b9bc942cea006da9b"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f06c2d26d1999d37e93299db0ecead04ca7d0b9f"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.