GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-GMMH-HRWH-FF24

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-11-05 18:32 – Updated: 2024-11-08 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

cifs: fix warning when destroy 'cifs_io_request_pool'

There's a issue as follows: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 27826 at mm/slub.c:4698 free_large_kmalloc+0xac/0xe0 RIP: 0010:free_large_kmalloc+0xac/0xe0 Call Trace: ? __warn+0xea/0x330 mempool_destroy+0x13f/0x1d0 init_cifs+0xa50/0xff0 [cifs] do_one_initcall+0xdc/0x550 do_init_module+0x22d/0x6b0 load_module+0x4e96/0x5ff0 init_module_from_file+0xcd/0x130 idempotent_init_module+0x330/0x620 __x64_sys_finit_module+0xb3/0x110 do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

Obviously, 'cifs_io_request_pool' is not created by mempool_create(). So just use mempool_exit() to revert 'cifs_io_request_pool'.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-50119"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-11-05T18:15:14Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncifs: fix warning when destroy \u0027cifs_io_request_pool\u0027\n\nThere\u0027s a issue as follows:\nWARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 27826 at mm/slub.c:4698 free_large_kmalloc+0xac/0xe0\nRIP: 0010:free_large_kmalloc+0xac/0xe0\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n ? __warn+0xea/0x330\n mempool_destroy+0x13f/0x1d0\n init_cifs+0xa50/0xff0 [cifs]\n do_one_initcall+0xdc/0x550\n do_init_module+0x22d/0x6b0\n load_module+0x4e96/0x5ff0\n init_module_from_file+0xcd/0x130\n idempotent_init_module+0x330/0x620\n __x64_sys_finit_module+0xb3/0x110\n do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x1d0\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nObviously, \u0027cifs_io_request_pool\u0027 is not created by mempool_create().\nSo just use mempool_exit() to revert \u0027cifs_io_request_pool\u0027.",
  "id": "GHSA-gmmh-hrwh-ff24",
  "modified": "2024-11-08T18:30:48Z",
  "published": "2024-11-05T18:32:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-50119"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2ce1007f42b8a6a0814386cb056feb28dc6d6091"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/726416a253c51037636ecc65ad3dada3d02dcaea"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…