GHSA-GM68-G349-GXGG

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-01-28 22:35 – Updated: 2022-01-28 22:20
VLAI?
Summary
Denial of service in bingrep
Details

Bingrep v0.8.5 was discovered to contain a memory allocation failure which can cause a Denial of Service (DoS).

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "bingrep"
      },
      "versions": [
        "0.8.5"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-39480"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-770"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2022-01-28T22:20:30Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2022-01-21T22:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Bingrep v0.8.5 was discovered to contain a memory allocation failure which can cause a Denial of Service (DoS).",
  "id": "GHSA-gm68-g349-gxgg",
  "modified": "2022-01-28T22:20:30Z",
  "published": "2022-01-28T22:35:16Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-39480"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/m4b/bingrep/issues/30"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/m4b/bingrep"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [],
  "summary": "Denial of service in bingrep"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…