GHSA-GFPH-G5W3-9G35
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-02 00:10 – Updated: 2022-05-02 00:10
VLAI
Details
Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in Adobe Flash CS3 Professional on Windows and Flash MX 2004 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an SWF file containing long control parameters.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-4473"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-10-17T19:31:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in Adobe Flash CS3 Professional on Windows and Flash MX 2004 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an SWF file containing long control parameters.",
"id": "GHSA-gfph-g5w3-9g35",
"modified": "2022-05-02T00:10:30Z",
"published": "2022-05-02T00:10:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-4473"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/45914"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32246"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://security-assessment.com/files/advisories/2008-10-16_Multiple_Flash_Authoring_Heap_Overflows.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/4429"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1021060"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa08-09.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/497397/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31769"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2837"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…