GHSA-GCRW-4MFC-P64J

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 23:57 – Updated: 2022-05-01 23:57
VLAI?
Details

Unspecified vulnerability in phpBB before 3.0.1 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to "urls gone through redirect() being used within login_box()."

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2008-3224"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2008-07-18T16:41:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Unspecified vulnerability in phpBB before 3.0.1 has unknown impact and attack vectors related to \"urls gone through redirect() being used within login_box().\"",
  "id": "GHSA-gcrw-4mfc-p64j",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T23:57:56Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T23:57:56Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-3224"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/44208"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/07/12/1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=14\u0026t=1059565\u0026sid=2d3a6352a484588e1ad80f09dd19fe33"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…