GHSA-GC8H-W3QG-MPCQ

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-03 18:33 – Updated: 2026-06-09 21:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amd/display: Fix dc_link NULL handling in HPD init

amdgpu_dm_hpd_init() may see connectors without a valid dc_link.

The code already checks dc_link for the polling decision, but later unconditionally dereferences it when setting up HPD interrupts.

Assign dc_link early and skip connectors where it is NULL.

Fixes the below: drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c:940 amdgpu_dm_hpd_init() error: we previously assumed 'dc_link' could be null (see line 931)

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c 923 / 924 * Analog connectors may be hot-plugged unlike other connector 925 * types that don't support HPD. Only poll analog connectors. 926 / 927 use_polling |= 928 amdgpu_dm_connector->dc_link && ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The patch adds this NULL check but hopefully it can be removed

929                         dc_connector_supports_analog(amdgpu_dm_connector->dc_link->link_id.id);
930
931                 dc_link = amdgpu_dm_connector->dc_link;

dc_link assigned here.

932
933                 /*
934                  * Get a base driver irq reference for hpd ints for the lifetime
935                  * of dm. Note that only hpd interrupt types are registered with
936                  * base driver; hpd_rx types aren't. IOW, amdgpu_irq_get/put on
937                  * hpd_rx isn't available. DM currently controls hpd_rx
938                  * explicitly with dc_interrupt_set()
939                  */

--> 940 if (dc_link->irq_source_hpd != DC_IRQ_SOURCE_INVALID) { ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If it's NULL then we are trouble because we dereference it here.

941                         irq_type = dc_link->irq_source_hpd - DC_IRQ_SOURCE_HPD1;
942                         /*
943                          * TODO: There's a mismatch between mode_info.num_hpd
944                          * and what bios reports as the # of connectors with hpd
Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-46245"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-476"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-06-03T18:16:24Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: Fix dc_link NULL handling in HPD init\n\namdgpu_dm_hpd_init() may see connectors without a valid dc_link.\n\nThe code already checks dc_link for the polling decision, but later\nunconditionally dereferences it when setting up HPD interrupts.\n\nAssign dc_link early and skip connectors where it is NULL.\n\nFixes the below:\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c:940 amdgpu_dm_hpd_init()\nerror: we previously assumed \u0027dc_link\u0027 could be null (see line 931)\n\ndrivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_irq.c\n    923                 /*\n    924                  * Analog connectors may be hot-plugged unlike other connector\n    925                  * types that don\u0027t support HPD. Only poll analog connectors.\n    926                  */\n    927                 use_polling |=\n    928                         amdgpu_dm_connector-\u003edc_link \u0026\u0026\n                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The patch adds this NULL check but hopefully it can be removed\n\n    929                         dc_connector_supports_analog(amdgpu_dm_connector-\u003edc_link-\u003elink_id.id);\n    930\n    931                 dc_link = amdgpu_dm_connector-\u003edc_link;\n\ndc_link assigned here.\n\n    932\n    933                 /*\n    934                  * Get a base driver irq reference for hpd ints for the lifetime\n    935                  * of dm. Note that only hpd interrupt types are registered with\n    936                  * base driver; hpd_rx types aren\u0027t. IOW, amdgpu_irq_get/put on\n    937                  * hpd_rx isn\u0027t available. DM currently controls hpd_rx\n    938                  * explicitly with dc_interrupt_set()\n    939                  */\n--\u003e 940                 if (dc_link-\u003eirq_source_hpd != DC_IRQ_SOURCE_INVALID) {\n                            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ If it\u0027s NULL then we are trouble because we dereference it here.\n\n    941                         irq_type = dc_link-\u003eirq_source_hpd - DC_IRQ_SOURCE_HPD1;\n    942                         /*\n    943                          * TODO: There\u0027s a mismatch between mode_info.num_hpd\n    944                          * and what bios reports as the # of connectors with hpd",
  "id": "GHSA-gc8h-w3qg-mpcq",
  "modified": "2026-06-09T21:32:20Z",
  "published": "2026-06-03T18:33:12Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-46245"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/226a40c06a183abaeb7529a4f54d6c203bd14407"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a490e4d3c9fed1e690c8de348416eea3a9f054ff"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…