GHSA-G9J9-8GXH-GH9R
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-11-12 12:30 – Updated: 2026-10-30 15:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to truncate first page in error path of f2fs_truncate()
syzbot reports a bug as below:
loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 40427 F2FS-fs (loop0): Wrong SSA boundary, start(3584) end(4096) blocks(3072) F2FS-fs (loop0): Can't find valid F2FS filesystem in 1th superblock F2FS-fs (loop0): invalid crc value F2FS-fs (loop0): f2fs_convert_inline_folio: corrupted inline inode ino=3, i_addr[0]:0x1601, run fsck to fix. ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:753! RIP: 0010:clear_inode+0x169/0x190 fs/inode.c:753 Call Trace: evict+0x504/0x9c0 fs/inode.c:810 f2fs_fill_super+0x5612/0x6fa0 fs/f2fs/super.c:5047 get_tree_bdev_flags+0x40e/0x4d0 fs/super.c:1692 vfs_get_tree+0x8f/0x2b0 fs/super.c:1815 do_new_mount+0x2a2/0x9e0 fs/namespace.c:3808 do_mount fs/namespace.c:4136 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4347 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x317/0x410 fs/namespace.c:4324 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
During f2fs_evict_inode(), clear_inode() detects that we missed to truncate all page cache before destorying inode, that is because in below path, we will create page #0 in cache, but missed to drop it in error path, let's fix it.
- evict
- f2fs_evict_inode
- f2fs_truncate
- f2fs_convert_inline_inode
- f2fs_grab_cache_folio : create page #0 in cache
- f2fs_convert_inline_folio : sanity check failed, return -EFSCORRUPTED
- clear_inode detects that inode->i_data.nrpages is not zero
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-40137"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-11-12T11:15:43Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix to truncate first page in error path of f2fs_truncate()\n\nsyzbot reports a bug as below:\n\nloop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 40427\nF2FS-fs (loop0): Wrong SSA boundary, start(3584) end(4096) blocks(3072)\nF2FS-fs (loop0): Can\u0027t find valid F2FS filesystem in 1th superblock\nF2FS-fs (loop0): invalid crc value\nF2FS-fs (loop0): f2fs_convert_inline_folio: corrupted inline inode ino=3, i_addr[0]:0x1601, run fsck to fix.\n------------[ cut here ]------------\nkernel BUG at fs/inode.c:753!\nRIP: 0010:clear_inode+0x169/0x190 fs/inode.c:753\nCall Trace:\n \u003cTASK\u003e\n evict+0x504/0x9c0 fs/inode.c:810\n f2fs_fill_super+0x5612/0x6fa0 fs/f2fs/super.c:5047\n get_tree_bdev_flags+0x40e/0x4d0 fs/super.c:1692\n vfs_get_tree+0x8f/0x2b0 fs/super.c:1815\n do_new_mount+0x2a2/0x9e0 fs/namespace.c:3808\n do_mount fs/namespace.c:4136 [inline]\n __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:4347 [inline]\n __se_sys_mount+0x317/0x410 fs/namespace.c:4324\n do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline]\n do_syscall_64+0xfa/0x3b0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94\n entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f\n\nDuring f2fs_evict_inode(), clear_inode() detects that we missed to truncate\nall page cache before destorying inode, that is because in below path, we\nwill create page #0 in cache, but missed to drop it in error path, let\u0027s fix\nit.\n\n- evict\n - f2fs_evict_inode\n - f2fs_truncate\n - f2fs_convert_inline_inode\n - f2fs_grab_cache_folio\n : create page #0 in cache\n - f2fs_convert_inline_folio\n : sanity check failed, return -EFSCORRUPTED\n - clear_inode detects that inode-\u003ei_data.nrpages is not zero",
"id": "GHSA-g9j9-8gxh-gh9r",
"modified": "2026-10-30T15:32:18Z",
"published": "2025-11-12T12:30:27Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-40137"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3500d7e1ba53f39bdb8a5aa9c2066b2f08e8c92e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b0c8908faa18cded84d64822882a830ab1f4d26"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83a8e4efea022506a0e049e7206bdf8be9f78148"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9251a9e6e871cb03c4714a18efa8f5d4a8818450"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7b7ebdd7045a36454b3e388a2ecf50344fad9e6"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Drag nodes to arrange them. Double-click a related vulnerability to open it, or a source to visit its link. The Physics button on the left tunes the layout and the simulation; the legend at the bottom left hides or shows nodes by kind and by sighting type.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Vulnerability timeline
Sightings and recorded dates, grouped by day · UTC
How durations are calculated
Following the VTEM framework (Black Hat USA 2015), time to patch starts when the vendor or a coordinator was informed, total time to patch at discovery, and disclosure to patch at public disclosure; vendor response time runs from the report to its acknowledgement. Time to exploit and time unpatched start at the earliest discovery or report, falling back to public disclosure. Unpatched time ends at the first recorded patch, or the calculation time when no patch is recorded. Exploitation to patch shows the interval between those two events; a published proof of concept is a public exploit, not exploitation.
Each result shows its source dates. A negative interval means the end event came first; when date-only inputs leave the order open, the result says so. Date-only inputs are approximate. The earliest evidence wins: KEV report dates and sightings are labelled as such. Records describing another vulnerability are listed but never calculated from, and a PoC alone does not establish exploitation. Missing patch evidence does not prove that no patch exists. Filters below change the event list only.
Loading timeline…
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.