GHSA-G936-7JQJ-MWV8

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-10 21:43 – Updated: 2026-07-10 21:43
VLAI
Summary
TSDProxy: Internal proxy auth token forwarded to backend services enables management API escalation
Details

Description

A vulnerability was discovered in TSDProxy where it forwards its internal per-process authentication token to all proxied backend services. When identityHeaders is enabled (the default), tsdproxy injects x-tsdproxy-auth-token into every upstream HTTP request alongside user identity headers. This token is the same secret used by the management HTTP server to trust forwarded Tailscale identity claims. A backend that receives this token can replay it from localhost to the management port with an arbitrary x-tsdproxy-id value, bypassing Tailscale authentication entirely.

The token is forwarded unconditionally: ProviderUserMiddleware always calls WhoisNewContext regardless of whether the user is authenticated. In the ReverseProxy.Rewrite function, WhoisFromContext returns ok=true even for zero-value Whois{} (unauthenticated or Funnel requests). The HeaderAuthToken is set for every request when identityHeaders=true.

The attack requires the backend to reach 127.0.0.1:8080. This holds in: (1) non-Docker deployments where tsdproxy and a backend run on the same host, (2) Docker host-network-mode containers, (3) containers sharing tsdproxy's network namespace.

Affected files

  • internal/proxymanager/port.go:123-132
  • internal/core/admin.go:160-182
// port.go: auth token forwarded regardless of user authentication state
if identityHeaders {
    if user, ok := model.WhoisFromContext(r.In.Context()); ok {
        // ok=true even for empty Whois{} stored by ProviderUserMiddleware
        r.Out.Header.Set(consts.HeaderAuthToken, core.ProxyAuthToken()) // token sent to backend
    }
}

// admin.go: management port trusts x-tsdproxy-id from localhost when token is valid
func ResolveWhois(r *http.Request) model.Whois {
    if IsLocalhost(r.RemoteAddr) {
        return model.Whois{
            ID: r.Header.Get(consts.HeaderID), // attacker-controlled after stealing token
        }
    }
    return model.Whois{}
}

Steps to reproduce

  1. Deploy tsdproxy on a host (non-Docker) with a backend at http://localhost:3000.
  2. Make a request through the Tailscale proxy. The backend receives x-tsdproxy-auth-token in the request headers.
  3. From the host, replay the token to the management API:
# Capture token from backend headers (e.g., via a header-reflection endpoint)
TOKEN=$(curl -s http://localhost:3000/debug/headers | python3 -c "import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(d['headers'].get('X-Tsdproxy-Auth-Token',''))")

# Replay from localhost to gain admin access
curl -H "x-tsdproxy-auth-token: $TOKEN" \
     -H "x-tsdproxy-id: attacker" \
     http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/v1/proxies
# Returns full proxy list with admin access

Fix

Remove HeaderAuthToken from the outgoing backend request, and guard identity-header injection on user.ID != "":

// port.go: only inject headers for actually authenticated users
if identityHeaders {
    if user, ok := model.WhoisFromContext(r.In.Context()); ok && user.ID != "" {
        r.Out.Header.Set(consts.HeaderID, user.ID)
        // HeaderAuthToken should NOT be forwarded to backends
    }
}

Impact

An attacker with code execution in any backend proxied by tsdproxy (on the same host) gains full management API control: restart or pause all proxied services (DoS), enumerate all proxy configurations and backend network topology, and trigger webhook deliveries (SSRF via configured webhook URLs).

Credits

Reported by Vishal Shukla (@shukla304 / @therawdev).

Sponsorship

This audit is from an AI-assisted research agent at sechub.dev. Running it on OSS projects is free for maintainers.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Go",
        "name": "github.com/almeidapaulopt/tsdproxy"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "1.4.4-0.20260603142855-434819b4421e"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-200",
      "CWE-287"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-07-10T21:43:13Z",
    "nvd_published_at": null,
    "severity": "CRITICAL"
  },
  "details": "## Description\n\nA vulnerability was discovered in TSDProxy where it forwards its internal per-process authentication token to all proxied backend services. When `identityHeaders` is enabled (the default), tsdproxy injects `x-tsdproxy-auth-token` into every upstream HTTP request alongside user identity headers. This token is the same secret used by the management HTTP server to trust forwarded Tailscale identity claims. A backend that receives this token can replay it from localhost to the management port with an arbitrary `x-tsdproxy-id` value, bypassing Tailscale authentication entirely.\n\nThe token is forwarded unconditionally: `ProviderUserMiddleware` always calls `WhoisNewContext` regardless of whether the user is authenticated. In the `ReverseProxy.Rewrite` function, `WhoisFromContext` returns `ok=true` even for zero-value `Whois{}` (unauthenticated or Funnel requests). The `HeaderAuthToken` is set for every request when `identityHeaders=true`.\n\nThe attack requires the backend to reach `127.0.0.1:8080`. This holds in: (1) non-Docker deployments where tsdproxy and a backend run on the same host, (2) Docker host-network-mode containers, (3) containers sharing tsdproxy\u0027s network namespace.\n\n## Affected files\n\n- `internal/proxymanager/port.go:123-132`\n- `internal/core/admin.go:160-182`\n\n```go\n// port.go: auth token forwarded regardless of user authentication state\nif identityHeaders {\n    if user, ok := model.WhoisFromContext(r.In.Context()); ok {\n        // ok=true even for empty Whois{} stored by ProviderUserMiddleware\n        r.Out.Header.Set(consts.HeaderAuthToken, core.ProxyAuthToken()) // token sent to backend\n    }\n}\n\n// admin.go: management port trusts x-tsdproxy-id from localhost when token is valid\nfunc ResolveWhois(r *http.Request) model.Whois {\n    if IsLocalhost(r.RemoteAddr) {\n        return model.Whois{\n            ID: r.Header.Get(consts.HeaderID), // attacker-controlled after stealing token\n        }\n    }\n    return model.Whois{}\n}\n```\n\n## Steps to reproduce\n\n1. Deploy tsdproxy on a host (non-Docker) with a backend at `http://localhost:3000`.\n2. Make a request through the Tailscale proxy. The backend receives `x-tsdproxy-auth-token` in the request headers.\n3. From the host, replay the token to the management API:\n\n```bash\n# Capture token from backend headers (e.g., via a header-reflection endpoint)\nTOKEN=$(curl -s http://localhost:3000/debug/headers | python3 -c \"import sys,json; d=json.load(sys.stdin); print(d[\u0027headers\u0027].get(\u0027X-Tsdproxy-Auth-Token\u0027,\u0027\u0027))\")\n\n# Replay from localhost to gain admin access\ncurl -H \"x-tsdproxy-auth-token: $TOKEN\" \\\n     -H \"x-tsdproxy-id: attacker\" \\\n     http://127.0.0.1:8080/api/v1/proxies\n# Returns full proxy list with admin access\n```\n\n## Fix\n\nRemove `HeaderAuthToken` from the outgoing backend request, and guard identity-header injection on `user.ID != \"\"`:\n\n```go\n// port.go: only inject headers for actually authenticated users\nif identityHeaders {\n    if user, ok := model.WhoisFromContext(r.In.Context()); ok \u0026\u0026 user.ID != \"\" {\n        r.Out.Header.Set(consts.HeaderID, user.ID)\n        // HeaderAuthToken should NOT be forwarded to backends\n    }\n}\n```\n\n## Impact\n\nAn attacker with code execution in any backend proxied by tsdproxy (on the same host) gains full management API control: restart or pause all proxied services (DoS), enumerate all proxy configurations and backend network topology, and trigger webhook deliveries (SSRF via configured webhook URLs).\n\n## Credits\n\nReported by Vishal Shukla (@shukla304 / @therawdev).\n\n## Sponsorship\n\nThis audit is from an AI-assisted research agent at [sechub.dev](https://sechub.dev). Running it on OSS projects is free for maintainers.",
  "id": "GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8",
  "modified": "2026-07-10T21:43:13Z",
  "published": "2026-07-10T21:43:13Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/almeidapaulopt/tsdproxy/security/advisories/GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/almeidapaulopt/tsdproxy"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "TSDProxy: Internal proxy auth token forwarded to backend services enables management API escalation"
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…