GHSA-G935-CHXQ-F255
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-16 12:30 – Updated: 2026-09-16 15:30In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amd/display: validate plane degamma LUT size for private color prop
Unlike the CRTC degamma path, which is guarded by amdgpu_dm_verify_lut_sizes(), the per-plane degamma LUT size was never validated before use. __set_dm_plane_degamma() passed the user-supplied size straight into __is_lut_linear() and, for a non-linear LUT, into __set_input_tf() -> __drm_lut_to_dc_gamma(), the latter always iterating MAX_COLOR_LUT_ENTRIES entries regardless of the actual LUT size.
A malformed AMD_PLANE_DEGAMMA_LUT blob (e.g. a single entry) could thus trigger a divide-by-zero in __is_lut_linear() or an out-of-bounds read in __drm_lut_to_dc_gamma(). Reject any plane degamma LUT whose size does not match MAX_COLOR_LUT_ENTRIES, mirroring the invariant the code already asserts a few lines below (and which the CRTC path enforces).
The AMD_PLANE_DEGAMMA_LUT property is only exposed on builds with AMD_PRIVATE_COLOR defined.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-89819"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-16T11:16:47Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amd/display: validate plane degamma LUT size for private color prop\n\nUnlike the CRTC degamma path, which is guarded by\namdgpu_dm_verify_lut_sizes(), the per-plane degamma LUT size was never\nvalidated before use. __set_dm_plane_degamma() passed the user-supplied\nsize straight into __is_lut_linear() and, for a non-linear LUT, into\n__set_input_tf() -\u003e __drm_lut_to_dc_gamma(), the latter always iterating\nMAX_COLOR_LUT_ENTRIES entries regardless of the actual LUT size.\n\nA malformed AMD_PLANE_DEGAMMA_LUT blob (e.g. a single entry) could thus\ntrigger a divide-by-zero in __is_lut_linear() or an out-of-bounds read in\n__drm_lut_to_dc_gamma(). Reject any plane degamma LUT whose size does not\nmatch MAX_COLOR_LUT_ENTRIES, mirroring the invariant the code already\nasserts a few lines below (and which the CRTC path enforces).\n\nThe AMD_PLANE_DEGAMMA_LUT property is only exposed on builds with\nAMD_PRIVATE_COLOR defined.",
"id": "GHSA-g935-chxq-f255",
"modified": "2026-09-16T15:30:58Z",
"published": "2026-09-16T12:30:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89819"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b2615b8b54f58bbdf986dffb38cbc35214a5cc5"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b10cc09b329245c6d95f8fa3e7f068575e3e0e9f"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4c3ab59021e7c146a84b6671f0d530972bd58b4"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f6f04d8ae5725bcc893bdc62e3467efd97255c5b"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.