GHSA-G6GF-CC36-X6JR

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:39 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:49
VLAI
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in the Provideo ActiveX controls allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted input fields, as demonstrated by (1) a long strIp argument to the voice method in 2way.dll in the alarm 1.0.3.1 ActiveX control, (2) a network response to AXPlayer.ocx in the GMAXPlayer 2.0.8.2 ActiveX control, the (3) UserName or (4) Password parameter to AXPlayer.ocx in the GMAXPlayer 2.0.8.2 ActiveX control, (5) a long Id parameter to the GetString method in PAxPlayer.ocx in the PAxPlayer 3.0.0.9 ActiveX control, or (6) a long strAdr parameter to the ConnectIPCam method in PAxPlayer.ocx in the PAxPlayer 3.0.0.9 ActiveX control.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-2591"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-119"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2011-08-05T21:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in the Provideo ActiveX controls allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted input fields, as demonstrated by (1) a long strIp argument to the voice method in 2way.dll in the alarm 1.0.3.1 ActiveX control, (2) a network response to AXPlayer.ocx in the GMAXPlayer 2.0.8.2 ActiveX control, the (3) UserName or (4) Password parameter to AXPlayer.ocx in the GMAXPlayer 2.0.8.2 ActiveX control, (5) a long Id parameter to the GetString method in PAxPlayer.ocx in the PAxPlayer 3.0.0.9 ActiveX control, or (6) a long strAdr parameter to the ConnectIPCam method in PAxPlayer.ocx in the PAxPlayer 3.0.0.9 ActiveX control.",
  "id": "GHSA-g6gf-cc36-x6jr",
  "modified": "2025-04-11T03:49:12Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:39:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-2591"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/74310"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/74311"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/74312"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/74313"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/74314"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-56"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-57"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-58"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/48977"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…