GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-G4QG-7MGJ-P8V6

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-07-28 12:30 – Updated: 2026-01-07 18:30
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

comedi: Fix use of uninitialized data in insn_rw_emulate_bits()

For Comedi INSN_READ and INSN_WRITE instructions on "digital" subdevices (subdevice types COMEDI_SUBD_DI, COMEDI_SUBD_DO, and COMEDI_SUBD_DIO), it is common for the subdevice driver not to have insn_read and insn_write handler functions, but to have an insn_bits handler function for handling Comedi INSN_BITS instructions. In that case, the subdevice's insn_read and/or insn_write function handler pointers are set to point to the insn_rw_emulate_bits() function by __comedi_device_postconfig().

For INSN_WRITE, insn_rw_emulate_bits() currently assumes that the supplied data[0] value is a valid copy from user memory. It will at least exist because do_insnlist_ioctl() and do_insn_ioctl() in "comedi_fops.c" ensure at lease MIN_SAMPLES (16) elements are allocated. However, if insn->n is 0 (which is allowable for INSN_READ and INSN_WRITE instructions, then data[0] may contain uninitialized data, and certainly contains invalid data, possibly from a different instruction in the array of instructions handled by do_insnlist_ioctl(). This will result in an incorrect value being written to the digital output channel (or to the digital input/output channel if configured as an output), and may be reflected in the internal saved state of the channel.

Fix it by returning 0 early if insn->n is 0, before reaching the code that accesses data[0]. Previously, the function always returned 1 on success, but it is supposed to be the number of data samples actually read or written up to insn->n, which is 0 in this case.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-38480"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-908"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-07-28T12:15:29Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ncomedi: Fix use of uninitialized data in insn_rw_emulate_bits()\n\nFor Comedi `INSN_READ` and `INSN_WRITE` instructions on \"digital\"\nsubdevices (subdevice types `COMEDI_SUBD_DI`, `COMEDI_SUBD_DO`, and\n`COMEDI_SUBD_DIO`), it is common for the subdevice driver not to have\n`insn_read` and `insn_write` handler functions, but to have an\n`insn_bits` handler function for handling Comedi `INSN_BITS`\ninstructions.  In that case, the subdevice\u0027s `insn_read` and/or\n`insn_write` function handler pointers are set to point to the\n`insn_rw_emulate_bits()` function by `__comedi_device_postconfig()`.\n\nFor `INSN_WRITE`, `insn_rw_emulate_bits()` currently assumes that the\nsupplied `data[0]` value is a valid copy from user memory.  It will at\nleast exist because `do_insnlist_ioctl()` and `do_insn_ioctl()` in\n\"comedi_fops.c\" ensure at lease `MIN_SAMPLES` (16) elements are\nallocated.  However, if `insn-\u003en` is 0 (which is allowable for\n`INSN_READ` and `INSN_WRITE` instructions, then `data[0]` may contain\nuninitialized data, and certainly contains invalid data, possibly from a\ndifferent instruction in the array of instructions handled by\n`do_insnlist_ioctl()`.  This will result in an incorrect value being\nwritten to the digital output channel (or to the digital input/output\nchannel if configured as an output), and may be reflected in the\ninternal saved state of the channel.\n\nFix it by returning 0 early if `insn-\u003en` is 0, before reaching the code\nthat accesses `data[0]`.  Previously, the function always returned 1 on\nsuccess, but it is supposed to be the number of data samples actually\nread or written up to `insn-\u003en`, which is 0 in this case.",
  "id": "GHSA-g4qg-7mgj-p8v6",
  "modified": "2026-01-07T18:30:18Z",
  "published": "2025-07-28T12:30:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-38480"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10f9024a8c824a41827fff1fefefb314c98e2c88"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16256d7efcf7acc9f39abe21522c4c6b77f67c00"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2af1e7d389c2619219171d23f5b96dbcbb7f9656"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3050d197d6bc9ef128944a70210f42d2430b3000"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3ab55ffaaf75d0c7b68e332c1cdcc1b0e0044870"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c2981bf30401adfcdbfece4ab6f411f7c5875a1"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c53570e62b5b28bdb56bb563190227f8307817a5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e9cb26291d009243a4478a7ffb37b3a9175bfce9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00007.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/10/msg00008.html"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…