GHSA-G227-WRGP-XCX3
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:16 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:16
VLAI
Details
Integer signedness error in the i386_set_ldt call in FreeBSD 5.5, and possibly earlier versions down to 5.2, allows local users to cause a denial of service (crash) via unspecified arguments that use negative signed integers to cause the bzero function to be called with a large length parameter, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-4172.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-4178"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-09-26T02:07:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Integer signedness error in the i386_set_ldt call in FreeBSD 5.5, and possibly earlier versions down to 5.2, allows local users to cause a denial of service (crash) via unspecified arguments that use negative signed integers to cause the bzero function to be called with a large length parameter, a different vulnerability than CVE-2006-4172.",
"id": "GHSA-g227-wrgp-xcx3",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:16:10Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:16:10Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4178"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22064"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016927"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=415"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/446946/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/20158"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…